CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References

Hits 1 to 3 of 3

_id sigradi2004_272
id sigradi2004_272
authors Rafael Zanelato Ledo; Alice T. Cybis Pereira
year 2004
title Análise do trabalho colaborativo síncrono á distância no desenvolvimento do projeto de arquitetura [Analysis of Synchronous Collaborative Work - Distance in the Development of an Architectural Project]
source SIGraDi 2004 - [Proceedings of the 8th Iberoamerican Congress of Digital Graphics] Porte Alegre - Brasil 10-12 november 2004
summary The development of the society imposed an increase on the program of the constructions and to supply that need there was the development of new specialties in the profession. Actually the architecture project involves a great number of professionals for its realization that demands an information capacity of coordination in an efficient and orderly way. This activity is done using collaborative systems to exchange the data of the projects with the people being in different places and in a different time. For the improvement of these collaborative enviroments and for the conception of new systems it is necessary the investigation of what happens in the collaboration among the professionals. To analyse the collaboration this research is based in six parameters: Involved agents, Tools used in communication, Received and delivery Materials, Stages of Project, Coordination and use of the Internet.
keywords Groupware, Collaborative Work, Simultaneous Project, Virtual Enviroments
series SIGRADI
email rafael@ecthus.com.br, pereira@cce.ufsc.br
last changed 2016/03/10 08:58

_id sigradi2015_sp_12.402
id sigradi2015_sp_12.402
authors Ryberg, Maria Candelária; Bratti, Maria Luiza; Cavalcanti, Patrícia Biasi; Ely, Vera Helena Moro Bins
year 2015
title Participatory design experience for a milk collecting room of a hospital in Florianópolis
source SIGRADI 2015 [Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics - vol. 2 - ISBN: 978-85-8039-133-6] Florianópolis, SC, Brasil 23-27 November 2015, pp. 836-840.
summary This article describes the experience of a participatory design project of a milk collecting room. The objective of this project was to identify the desirable attributes of the environment and contemplate participatory design applications. The methodology used includes: AEIOU, SWOT analysis, Brainstorming, Wish Poems, interaction with the proposals using 3D modeling and Visual Selection. The present work confirms the benefits of the participatory process as a possibility to expand the comprehension of the user’s needs. Moreover, the project proved that digitalized graphic resources are easy to use and are beneficial to interaction with the present proposal.
keywords Participatory Design, Interior Design, Health Care Enviroments, Milk Bank
series SIGRADI
email candelaria.ryberg@gmail.com
last changed 2016/03/10 08:59

_id caadria2013_024
id caadria2013_024
authors Yu, Rongrong; Ning Gu and Michael Ostwald
year 2013
title A Method for Comparing Designers’ Behavior in Two Enviroments: Parametric and Geometric Modeling
source Open Systems: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013) / Singapore 15-18 May 2013, pp. 479-488
summary Previous research into designers’ behaviour in parametric environments suggests that parametric tools support or promote design processes in a wide variety of ways. However, despite the results of such research, there is a lack of empirical evidence directly comparing how design in parametric environments differs from design in traditional environments. Aiming to address this issue, a pilot study is presented in this paper comparing designers’ behaviour in Parametric Design Environments (PDEs) with that in more traditional, Geometric Modelling Environments (GMEs). In the study five designers completed two design tasks respectively in PDEs and GMEs. By employing the method of protocol analysis, different behaviours in the two design environments were identified and compared. This paper focuses on the results of testing the experimental setting and of the coding scheme used in the study. One example set of results from the pilot study is reported – where in the designer’s behaviour exhibits some differences between the two environments – in order to provide an example of the coding used. 
wos WOS:000351496100047
keywords Parametric design environments, Geometry modelling environments, Designers’ behaviour, Protocol analysis, Pilot study 
series CAADRIA
email rongrong.yu@uon.edu.au
last changed 2016/05/16 09:08

No more hits.

HOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_438936 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002