CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References
authors Johnson, Scott and Goldman, Glenn
year 2001
title Binary Oppositions: Should an Introduction to Computing in Architecture Be Taught as Separate Course?
source ACADIA Quarterly, vol. 20, pp. 3-5
summary For quite some time, the traditional teaching approach by most architecture schools has been to separate design studios from other courses. New courses have occasionally added, to cover subjects not previously included in the curriculum. However, as technologies change and new, computer- based design tools are developed, it is worthwhile consider whether these new technologies should be introduced into the curriculum in the same way. Should courses be added to the curriculum, to supplement replace courses covering traditional tools and media? Or unnecessary or even inappropriate for the new technologies? This Binary Oppositions debate addresses this issue. question is, “Should an introduction to computing in architecture be taught as a separate course?” I argue to the affirmative. Glenn Goldman of NJIT argues to the negative. These arguments and our respective rebuttals are presented below.
series ACADIA
email sven@umich.edu
full text file.pdf (357,733 bytes)
references Content-type: text/plain
last changed 2002/12/15 13:17
pick and add to favorite papersHOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_396074 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002