CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

id acadia11_316
authors d’Estree Sterk, Tristan
year 2011
title Using Robotic Technologies to Integrate External Influences in Design
source ACADIA 11: Integration through Computation [Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA)] [ISBN 978-1-6136-4595-6] Banff (Alberta) 13-16 October, 2011, pp. 316-317
summary Designers have always assembled materials to form purposeful connections between ideas and spaces, uniting the height of human thought with the great ability of people to shape the world with their hands and tools. People have understood this opportunity and used it to inform the material investments that they make in buildings.When reflecting upon the past ten or so years of practice it is clear that some methodologies have matured. Professionals, academics and students have found new ways to connect thinking and doing. These connections have a different flavor and tend to feel more analytical to those once used. Previously internalized decisions are being made increasingly explicit by a generation of designers that has found a more meaningful overlap between the theories and procedures of design. The methods they use are visual, analytical, as well as intuitive, and encompassed within a whole gamut of tools such as Grasshopper, Ecotect, Digital Project and Generative Components. All of these tools provide opportunities for designers to inquisitively explore alternative formal, spatial and environmental relationships. The opportunities that are brought by increasing externalization are important. Design is at once turning away from its focus on the end result, be it a building or an interior, and toward a renewed interest in the design process itself. Brought about by encapsulating design principles into self-made tools, this shift has enabled families of formal outcomes rather than singular instances of ‘pure’ architecture. These multiple, equally valid, formal outcomes disrupt more traditional measures of formal legitimacy and help move architects toward more relational understandings of space, time and environment.
series ACADIA
type moderator overview
email tsterk@orambra.com
full text file.pdf (710,827 bytes)
references Content-type: text/plain
details citation check to select
100%; open J. Whiteman (1987) Find in CUMINCAD On Hegel’s Definition of Architecture , Assemblage no. 2 (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), 6-17
100%; open M. McClusky (2009) Find in CUMINCAD Track Analyze Optimize , Wired Magazine 17, no.7:80-126 (Conde Nast Media, 2009)

last changed 2011/10/06 04:05
HOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_717941 from group guest) Works Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002