CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References
id caadria2018_125
authors Bungbrakearti, Narissa, Cooper-Wooley, Ben, Odolphi, Jorke, Doherty, Ben, Fabbri, Alessandra, Gardner, Nicole and Haeusler, M. Hank
year 2018
title HOLOSYNC - A Comparative Study on Mixed Reality and Contemporary Communication Methods in a Building Design Context
source T. Fukuda, W. Huang, P. Janssen, K. Crolla, S. Alhadidi (eds.), Learning, Adapting and Prototyping - Proceedings of the 23rd CAADRIA Conference - Volume 1, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 17-19 May 2018, pp. 401-410
summary The integration of technology into the design process has enabled us to communicate through various modes of virtuality, while more traditional face-to-face collaborations are becoming less frequent, specifically for large scale companies. Both modes of communication have benefits and disadvantages - virtual communication enables us to connect over large distances, however can often lead to miscommunication, while face-to-face communication builds stronger relationship, however may be problematic for geographically dispersed teams. Mixed Reality is argued to be a hybrid of face-to-face and virtual communication, and is yet to be integrated into the building design process. Despite its current limitations, such as field of view, Mixed Reality is an effective tool that generates high levels of nonverbal and verbal communication, and encourages a high and equal level of participation in comparison to virtual and face-to-face communication. Being a powerful communication tool for complex visualisations, it would be best implemented in the later stages of the building design process where teams can present designs to clients or where multiple designers can collaborate over final details.
keywords Mixed Reality; Communication; Hololens; Collaboration; Virtual
series CAADRIA
email m.haeusler@unsw.edu.au
full text file.pdf (575,532 bytes)
references Content-type: text/plain
Details Citation Select
100%; open Billinghurst, M, Kiyokawa, K, Belcher, D and Poupyrev, I (2002) Find in CUMINCAD Experiments with Face-To-Face Collaborative AR Interfaces , Springer Link, 6, pp. 107-121

100%; open Bordia, P (1997) Find in CUMINCAD Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , Journal of Business Communication, 34, pp. 99-120

100%; open Burgoon, -, Judee, K, Joseph, AB, Norah, E, Dunbar, A, Artemio, R, Karadeen, K and Jenna, F (2002) Find in CUMINCAD Testing the interactive Principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction , Journal of Communication, 52(3), pp. 657-677

100%; open Hiltz, SR and Johnson, K (1989) Find in CUMINCAD Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , Experiments in group decision making, 3, pp. 210-232

100%; open Milgram, P and Kishino, F (1994) Find in CUMINCAD A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D(12), pp. 1321-1329

100%; open Pauleen, D and Yoong, P (2001) Find in CUMINCAD Facilitating virtual team relationships via the internet and conventional communication channels , Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policies, 11(3), pp. 190-202

100%; open Raymond Blenke, L (2013) Find in CUMINCAD The Role of Face-to-Face Interactions in the Success of Virtual Project Teams , Ph.D. Thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology

last changed 2018/05/17 07:08
pick and add to favorite papersHOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_939786 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002