CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References
id sigradi2008_166
authors Papanikolaou, Dimitris
year 2008
title Digital Fabrication Production System Theory: Towards an Integrated Environment for Design and Production of Assemblies
source SIGraDi 2008 - [Proceedings of the 12th Iberoamerican Congress of Digital Graphics] La Habana - Cuba 1-5 December 2008
summary A Digital Fabrication Production System (DFPS) is a concept describing a set of processes, tools, and resources that will be able to produce an artifact according to a design, fast, cheap, and easy, independently of location. A DFPS project is a complex assembly of custom parts that is delivered by a network of fabrication and assembly processes. This network is called the value chain. The workflow concept of a DFPS is the following: begin design process with a custom geometric form; decompose it into constructible parts; send the part files for fabrication to various locations; transport all parts at the construction site at the right time; finally, assemble the final artifact. Conceptually it means that based on a well structured value chain we could build anything we want, at anyplace, at controllable cost and quality. The goals of a DFPS are the following: custom shapes, controllable lead time, controllable quality, controllable cost, easiness of fabrication, and easiness of assembly. Simply stated this means to build any form, anywhere, accurately, cheap, fast, and easy. Unfortunately, the reality with current Digital Fabrication (DF) projects is rather disappointing: They take more time than what was planned, they get more expensive than what was expected, they involve great risk and uncertainty, and finally they are too complex to plan, understand, and manage. Moreover, most of these problems are discovered during production when it is already late for correction. However, there is currently no systematic approach to evaluate difficulty of production of DF projects in Architecture. Most of current risk assessment methods are based on experience gathered from previous similar cases. But it is the premise of mass customization that projects can be radically different. Assembly incompatibilities are currently addressed by building physical mockups. But physical mockups cause a significant loss in both time and cost. All these problems suggest that an introduction of a DFPS for mass customization in architecture needs first an integrated theory of assembly and management control. Evaluating feasibility of a DF project has two main problems: first, how to evaluate assemblability of the design; second, how to evaluate performance of the value chain. Assemblability is a systemís structure problem, while performance is a systemís dynamics problem. Structure of systems has been studied in the field of Systems Engineering by Network Analysis methods such as the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) (Steward 1981), and the liaison graph (Whitney 2004), while dynamics of systems have been studied by System Dynamics (Forrester 1961). Can we define a formal method to evaluate the difficulty of production of an artifact if we know the artifactís design and the production systemís structure? This paper formulates Attribute Process Methodology (APM); a method for assessing feasibility of a DFPS project that combines Network Analysis to evaluate assemblability of the design with System Dynamics to evaluate performance of the value chain.
keywords Digital Fabrication, Production System, System Dynamics, Network Analysis, Assembly
series SIGRADI
email dimp@mit.edu
full text file.pdf (1,868,848 bytes)
references Content-type: text/plain
Details Citation Select
100%; open D. E. Whitney (2004) Find in CUMINCAD Mechanical Assemblies: Their Design, Manufacture, and Role in Product Development , New York: Oxford University Press

100%; open D. E. Whitney (2006) Find in CUMINCAD Network Models of Mechanical Assemblies , International Conference on Complex Systems, Boston

100%; open D. Papanikolaou (2008) Find in CUMINCAD Evaluating Assemblies of Planar Parts Using the Liaison Graph and System Dynamics , Proc. 26th Int. Conf. eCAADe, Antwerp, 2008, pp. 787-794

100%; open D. Papanikolaou (2008) Find in CUMINCAD From Representation of States to Description of Processes , Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Critical Digital, Harvard University, Cambridge, 2008, pp. 311-318

100%; open D. Papanikolaou (2008) Find in CUMINCAD Attribute Process Methodology: Feasibility Assessment of Digital Fabrication Production Systems for Planar Part Assemblies Using Network Analysis and System Dynamics , M.S. thesis, Dept. Architecture., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA

100%; open D. V. Steward (1981) Find in CUMINCAD Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design , Petrocelli Books

100%; open J. D. Sterman (2000) Find in CUMINCAD Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , Boston: McGraw-Hill

100%; open J. W. Forrester (1961) Find in CUMINCAD Industrial Dynamics , Pegasus Communications

100%; open S. D. Eppinger, D. E. Whitney, R. P. Smith, and D. Gebala (1994) Find in CUMINCAD A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development , Research in Engineering Design, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-13

last changed 2016/03/10 08:57
pick and add to favorite papersHOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_752499 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002