Cumincad : CUMINCAD References : Search Results

CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References

Hits 1 to 20 of 3822

Reformat results as: short short into frame detailed detailed into frame

Details	Citation	Select
	Shum, S.J.B., Uren, V., Li, GM, Domingue, J., Motta, E. (2002) Visualising Internetworked Argumentation , P.A. Kirschner, S.J.B. Shum and C.S. Carr (eds.), Visualising Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Press. Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 185-204

	Shum, S.J.B., Uren, V., Li, GM, Domingue, J., Motta, E. (2002) Visualising Internetworked Argumentation , P.A. Kirschner, S.J.B. Shum and C.S. Carr (eds.), Visualising Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Press. Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 185-204

	Cho, K., & Jonassen D. (2002) The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. , Educational Technology, Research and Development, p. 5-22

	Dijkstra, J., H.J.P. Timmermans, and A.J Jessurun (2002) A Multi-Agent Cellular Automata System for Visualising Simulated Pedestrian Activity , Bandini and Worsch (eds.), Theoretical and Practical Issues on Cellular Automata, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry, Springer, p. 29-36

	Saakes, D. and Stappers, P. J. (2002) Designing Architectural Walkthroughs: From Simulations to Presentations by Visualising Narrative Transitions , International Journal of Design Computing Volume-4, http://faculty.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/journal/vol4/ articles.html

	Stumpf, S. C. and J. T. McDonnell (2002) Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes , Design Studies 23(1): 5-23

	Stumpf, S.C and J.T. McDonnell (2002) Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyze and support experiential learning in early design episode , Design studies 23 p 1-6

	Stumpf, S.C. & McDonnell, J.T. (2002) Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes , Design Studies, 23(1), pp. 5 - 23

	Stumpf, S.C. & McDonnell, J.T. (2002) Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes , Design Studies, 23(1), pp. 5 - 23

	Stumpf, S.C. and McDonnell, J.T. (2002) Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes , Design Studies, 23(1), pp. 5 - 23

	Stumpf, S.C. and McDonnell, J.T. (2002) Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes , Design Studies, 23(1), p. 5 - 23

	(2002) Concept analysis as empirical method , International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), 35–48

	(2002) A “Social Model” of Design: Issues of Practice and Research , Design Issues 18:4, 24–30

	(2002) Design patterns: abstraction and reuse of object-oriented design , B. Manfred and D. Ernst (eds). Software pioneers, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.: 701-717

	(2002) Affect and processing dynamics Perceptual fluency enhances evaluations , Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour, 44, 111

	(2002) Architectural interpretation of cellular automata , C. Soddu (Ed.), GA2002 Proc, Milan, Italy

	(2002) Light widgets: interacting in every-day spaces , Proc. IUI '02. 63-69

	(2002) From user-centred to participatory design approaches , J. Frascara (Ed.), Design and the social sciences: Making connections (pp. 1-8). London: Taylor y Francis

	(2002) Herzog & de Meuron 1978-2002 , U+U Feb 2002. Special issue. 202

	(2002) CAD and creativity: does the computer really help? , Leonardo, 35(3), 327-331

For more results click below: