CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References

Hits 1 to 6 of 6

_id ecaade2008_069
id ecaade2008_069
authors Mark, Earl; Gross, Mark; Goldschmidt , Gabriela
year 2008
title A Perspective on Computer Aided Design after Four Decades
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2008.169
source Architecture in Computro [26th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 978-0-9541183-7-2] Antwerpen (Belgium) 17-20 September 2008, pp. 169-176
summary We offer a summary view of competing theories that have guided and inspired the development of computer aided design over the past forty years with attention to how they support design processes. We identify eight distinct approaches to design. We then speculate on what a collective view of these schools posits with respect of the next generation of tools. This perspective reflects our view as teachers and researchers at institutions with different curricula, a first-hand role in the development of computer aided design technology, and specialization in design theory and methods.
keywords Design theory and methods, computer aided design software, constraints, parametric variation
series eCAADe
email
last changed 2022/06/07 07:59

_id acadia08_472
id acadia08_472
authors Key, Sora; Mark D Gross; Ellen Yi-Luen Do
year 2008
title Computing Spatial Qualities For Architecture
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2008.472
source Silicon + Skin: Biological Processes and Computation, [Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) / ISBN 978-0-9789463-4-0] Minneapolis 16-19 October 2008, 472-477
summary Computational representation of spatial qualities can lead us to a better understanding of how we construct spatial concepts. Analyses of spatial qualities can support architects in reasoning about the form of a configuration, helping them predict the consequences of a design. ¶ In this paper we present three definitions (enclosure, viewfield, continuity) that describe experiential qualities of architectural spaces. Our project aims to provide computable definitions to these qualities to describe common spatial experiences that are implicitly understood by architects. The description, using familiar terms, reveals the analytical structure of spatial qualities that is based on the geometry of the physical elements. ; We therefore introduce a graphic editor, Descriptor, that provides visualization of spatial qualities as the designer diagrams building elements. The system calculates perceived relationships (surrounded, visible, nearby, nearest) between a viewpoint and the architectural elements based on their geometric properties such as location and distance. The relationships are the components of the three qualities we define. We also present a use scenario to demonstrate how one might use our Descriptor system during early design. ¶ Descriptor is an attempt to formalize descriptions of the spatial qualities to help beginners understand how to make design decisions. In the future, we plan to extend the set of qualities and add detailed attributes of the physical elements to the system.
keywords Analysis; Computation; Environment; Representation; Spatial
series ACADIA
last changed 2022/06/07 07:52

_id caadria2008_19_session3a_161
id caadria2008_19_session3a_161
authors Oh, Yeonjoo; Mark D Gross, Ellen Yi-Luen Do
year 2008
title Computer-aided Critiquing systems Lessons Learned and New Research Directions
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2008.161
source CAADRIA 2008 [Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia] Chiang Mai (Thailand) 9-12 April 2008, pp. 161-167
summary A critiquing system helps designers improve their design artifacts by providing feedback. Computer-aided critiquing systems have been built in many fields and provide us with useful lessons. In this paper we analyze existing critiquing systems in terms of (1) critiquing process, (2) critiquing rules, and (3) intervention techniques. Based on this analysis, we suggest new research directions for critiquing systems in the domain of architectural design.
series CAADRIA
email
last changed 2022/06/07 08:00

_id ecaade2008_134
id ecaade2008_134
authors Burry, Jane; Burry, Mark
year 2008
title The Bonds of Spatial Freedom
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2008.301
source Architecture in Computro [26th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 978-0-9541183-7-2] Antwerpen (Belgium) 17-20 September 2008, pp. 301-308
summary In education and research at this time there is arguably no longer a need to build a strong case for the power of CAAD to support designers – the evidence is there. The major challenges no longer centre on hardware, software and graphics potential or on skills acquisition and adoption. The research that we will report here reveals that computational complexity and geometrical complexity are emerging as the sharp issues that demand a major review of how we model the large hybrid spaces that we seek to construct in design. Computational relational modeling and scripting may have opened a trove of creative possibilities. But it may delude us into painting ourselves into a corner: infinite variety within a much reduced palette of opportunities.
keywords Architectural Geometry, relational modeling, parametric design
series eCAADe
email
last changed 2022/06/07 07:54

_id acadia08_118
id acadia08_118
authors Cabrinha, Mark
year 2008
title Gridshell Tectonics: Material Values Digital Parameters
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2008.118
source Silicon + Skin: Biological Processes and Computation, [Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) / ISBN 978-0-9789463-4-0] Minneapolis 16-19 October 2008, 118-125
summary This paper begins with a simple proposition: rather than mimicking the geometric structures found in nature, perhaps the most effective modes of sustainable fabrication can be found through understanding the nature of materials themselves. Material becomes a design parameter through the constraints of fabrication tools, limitations of material size, and most importantly the productive capacity of material resistance—a given material’s capacity and tendencies to take shape, rather than cutting shape out of material. ¶ Gridshell structures provide an intriguing case study to pursue this proposition. Not only is there clear precedent in the form-finding experiments of Frei Otto and the Institute for Lightweight Structures, but also the very NURBS based tools of current design practices developed from the ability of wood to bend. Taking the bent wood spline quite literally, gridshells provide a means that is at once formally expressive, structurally optimized, materially efficient, and quite simply a delight to experience. The larger motivation of this work anticipates a parametric system linking the intrinsic material values of the gridshell tectonic with extrinsic criteria such as programmatic needs and environmental response. ¶ Through an applied case study of gridshells, the play between form and material is tested out through the author’s own experimentation with gridshells and the pedagogical results of two gridshell studios. The goal of this research is to establish a give-and-take relationship between top-down formal emphasis and a bottom-up material influence.
keywords Digital Fabrication; Form-Finding; Material; Pedagogy; Structure
series ACADIA
last changed 2022/06/07 07:54

_id ddss2008-40
id ddss2008-40
authors Marin, Ph.; J.C. Bignon, H. Lequay
year 2008
title Integral evolutionary design, integrated to early stageof architectural design processGenerative exploration of architectural envelope responding tosolar passive qualities
source H.J.P. Timmermans, B. de Vries (eds.) 2008, Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, ISBN 978-90-6814-173-3, University of Technology Eindhoven, published on CD
summary This paper tackles the exploration of generative digital tools in the field of architectural design. Evolutionary mechanisms are expected to help the designer and to support his creativity. Our purpose is to implement a digital tool based on a genetic algorithm, which uses environmental parameters and human interplay to evolve an architectural form. The analysis of design processes and CAD use lead us to mark a transformation of design process at a cognitive level.
keywords Genetic algorithm, generative architectural design process, environmental parameters
series DDSS
last changed 2008/09/01 17:06

No more hits.

HOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_396864 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002