Cumincad : CUMINCAD Papers : Search Results

Hits 1 to 2 of 2

_id	ecaade2015_ws-robowood
id	ecaade2015_ws-robowood
authors	Hornung, Philipp; Johannes Braumann, Reinhold Krobath, Sigrid Brell-Cokcan and Georg Glaeser
year	2015
title	Robotic Woodcraft: Creating Tools for Digital Design and Fabrication
doi	https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2015.2.033
source	Martens, B, Wurzer, G, Grasl T, Lorenz, WE and Schaffranek, R (eds.), Real Time - Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference - Volume 2, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 16-18 September 2015, pp. 33-36
summary	Robotic Woodcraft is a transdisciplinary, arts-based investigation into robotic arms at the University for Applied Arts Vienna. Bringing together the craftsmen of the Department for Wood Technology, the geometers of the Department for Arts and Technology, the young industrial design office Lucy.D and the roboticists of the Association for Robots in Architecture, the research project explores new approaches on how to couple high-tech robotic arms with high-end wood fabrication. In the eCAADe workshop, participants are introduced to KUKA\|prc (parametric robot control, Braumann and Brell-Cokcan, 2011) and shown approaches on how to create their own digital fabrication tools for customized fabrication processes involving wood.
wos	WOS:000372316000004
keywords	Robotic woodcraft; Arts-based research; Robotic fabrication; Visual programming; Parametric robot control
series	eCAADe
last changed	2022/06/07 07:50

_id	ecaade2011_112
id	ecaade2011_112
authors	Wurzer, Gabriel; Alaçam, Sema; Lorenz, Wolfgang
year	2011
title	How to Teach Architects (Computer) Programming: A Case Study
doi	https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2011.051
source	RESPECTING FRAGILE PLACES [29th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 978-9-4912070-1-3], University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture (Slovenia) 21-24 September 2011, pp.51-56
summary	Computer programming in architecture seems to be commonplace throughout the eCAADe Community. Yet, a critical evaluation of a programming course as seen from a student’s side is still missing. During a week-long programming workshop in a fellow university, we have been assessing subjective parameters such as mood, quality of presentation and comprehensibility, comparing these to the actual topics that were covered at this instance. Our results contribute to understanding architecture students in their quest towards algorithmical thinking. We are convinced that the discussion given in this paper will help other teachers to further increase the quality of their lectures. Furthermore, the structure of our approach may serve as basis for further research into recording student behavior during programming courses.
wos	WOS:000335665500004
keywords	Teaching; Programming; Assessment
series	eCAADe
email
last changed	2022/05/01 23:21

No more hits.