CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References

Hits 1 to 3 of 3

_id b2f9
id b2f9
authors Bhzad Sidawi and Neveen Hamza
year 2012
title INTELLIGENT KNOWLEDGE-BASED REPOSITORY TO SUPPORT INFORMED DESIGN DECISION MAKING
source ITCON journal
summary Research highlights that architectural design is a social phenomenon that is underpinned by critical analysis of design precedents and the social interaction between designers including negotiation, collaboration and communication. CAAD systems are continuously developing as essential design tools in formulating and developing ideas. Researchers such as (Rosenman, Gero and Oxman 1992) have suggested suggest that knowledge based systems can be integrated with CAAD systems to provide design knowledge that would enable recalling design precedents that maybe linked to the design constraints. Currently CAAD systems are user centric being focused on architects rather than the end product. The systems provide limited assistance in the production of innovative design. Furthermore, the attention of the designers of knowledge based systems is providing a repository rather than a system that is capable to initiate innovation. Most of the CAAD systems have web communication tools that enable designers to communicate their design ideas with colleagues and partners in business. However, none of these systems have the capability to capture useful knowledge from the design negotiations. Students of the third to fifth year at College of Architecture, University of Dammam were surveyed and interviewed to find out how far design tools, communications and resources would impact the production of innovative design projects. The survey results show that knowledge extracted from design negotiations would impact the innovative design outcome. It highlights also that present design precedents are not very helpful and design negotiations between students, tutors and other students are not documented thus fully incorporated into the design scheme. The paper argues that the future CAAD systems should be capable to recognize innovative design precedents, and incorporate knowledge that is resulted from design negotiations. This would help students to gain a critical mass of knowledge that would underpin informed design decisions.
series journal paper
type normal paper
email
more http://www.itcon.org/cgi-bin/works/Show?2012_20
last changed 2012/09/19 13:41

_id caadria2012_097
id caadria2012_097
authors Grace, Kazjon S.; John S. Gero and Rob Saunders
year 2012
title Constructing computational associations between ornamental designs
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2012.037
source Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia / Chennai 25-28 April 2012, pp. 37–46
summary This paper presents the application of a computational model of association to the domain of real-world ornamental designs. The driving principle of the model, interpretation-driven association, is discussed with respect to its suitability to design applications. An implementation of the model is presented, in which associations are constructed based on topological and typological relationships within each design's structure, rather than based on literal similarities. Results are presented which demonstrate that the implementation and the model from which it was derived are capable of associating between real-world design objects.
keywords Design association; design interpretation; computational modelling; ornamental designs
series CAADRIA
email
last changed 2022/06/07 07:51

_id caadria2012_077
id caadria2012_077
authors Kelly, Nick and John S. Gero
year 2012
title Computational modelling of the design conversation as a sequence of situated acts
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2012.121
source Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia / Chennai 25-28 April 2012, pp. 121–130
summary This paper describes the design conversation as a sequence of situated acts. It distinguishes the research questions that require attention for the computation of a more situated design conversation; in terms of design actions and design interpretations. It presents an architecture for ‘more situated’ systems and describes some examples of implementation. The limitations and complexities of what has been achieved are identified.
keywords Situatedness; situation; design conversation; situated computing
series CAADRIA
email
last changed 2022/06/07 07:52

No more hits.

HOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_560568 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002