| id |
2004_426 |
| authors |
Carrara, Gianfranco and Fioravanti, Antonio |
| year |
2004 |
| title |
How to Construct an Audience in Collaborative Design - The Relationship Among which Actors in the Design Process |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2004.426
|
| source |
Architecture in the Network Society [22nd eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9541183-2-4] Copenhagen (Denmark) 15-18 September 2004, pp. 426-434 |
| summary |
The features of complexity in architectural design have now been clarified. Complexity, intrinsic in architectural work, has increased in recent years as in all other fields of human endeavour – social, economic and cultural. In the specific case of architectural design, the most significant factors in this regard consist of the large number of actors, the numerous disciplines involved, technological innovation, regulations and rules governing the design process and the various different design aims. In order to address this complex of problems, long-term research based on the Collaborative Design paradigm, CD, is now being carried out. In it, thanks to the reciprocal exchange of information, the complementary nature of the knowledge possessed by the various actors, and the contemporary nature of the design action by the various actors on the same components, positive effects are exerted on the design as a whole. The latter thus gains in coherence and in improved integration among the design solutions proposed by the various actors. In CD all the actors are involved from the outset of the design work and are helped by distributed Knowledge Bases (KBs) and Intelligent Assistants (IAs). In this case it may happen that information and knowledge automatically exchanged among KBs (through the IAs) are excessive and/or not addressed to the right actors. How can information redundancy be avoided, and how can the flow of information sent over the network be controlled? The present paper introduces and defines the concept of „Audience“, that is, the group of actors to which it is permitted to send information concerning non respected requirements and the „reduced Audience“ to which to send the knowledge needed to overcome the difficulties encountered. |
| keywords |
Collaborative Architectural Design, Complexity, Intelligent Assistant, Context, Audience |
| series |
eCAADe |
| full text |
 file.pdf (858,853 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Carrara G., Fioravanti A., Novembri G. (2001)
 Knowledge-based System to Support Architectural Design. Intelligent objects, project net-constraints, collaborative work
, Hannu Pentilä (ed.), Architectural Information Management, 19th eCAADe Conference, Otamedia Oy, Espoo, pp. 80-85
|
|
|
|
|
Carrara, G and Fioravanti, A, Nanni, U (2004)
Knowledge Sharing, not MetaKnowledge. How to join a collaborative design Process and safely share one’s knowledge
, InterSymp 2004 Symposium, Baden-Baden, pp. 105-118
|
|
|
|
|
Carrara, G and Fioravanti, A (2002)
‘Private Space’ and ‘Shared Space’ Dialectics in Collaborative Architectural Design
, InterSymp 2002 Symposium, Baden-Baden, pp. 27-44
|
|
|
|
|
Carrara, G. and Fioravanti, A. (2001)
A Theoretical model of shared distributed Knowledge bases for Collaborative Architectural Design
, SKCF ’01 Conference Proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
Carrara, G. and Fioravanti, A. (2003)
Needs Requirements Performances Vs Goals Constraints Values
, Collaborative Architectural Design, Proceedings of SIGraDi 2003 Conference, Rosario, pp. 253-255
|
|
|
|
|
Eastman C.M., Jeng, T.S., and Chowdbury, R. (1997)
Integration of Design Application with Building Models
, R. Junge (ed.), CAAD Futures 1997, pp. 45-59
|
|
|
|
|
Gero, JS and Reffat RM (2001)
Multiple representation as platform for situated learning systems in designing
, Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(7): 337-351
|
|
|
|
|
Kalay, YE (2001)
Enhancing multi-disciplinary collaboration through semantically rich representation
, WL Porter,. and G Goldschmidt (guest eds.), Special Issue: Design Representation, Automation in Construction, 10(6), 741-755
|
|
|
|
|
Kolarevi, B, Schmitt, G, Hirschberg, U, Kurmann, D, Johnson, B (2000)
An experiment in design collaboration
, Automation in Construction, 9(1): 73-81
|
|
|
|
|
Kvan T (2000)
Collaborative design: what is it?
, Martens, B (guest ed.), Special Issue eCAADe ’97, Automation in Construction, 9(4): 409-415
|
|
|
|
|
Reffat, RM. and Gero, JS (2000)
Computational situated learning in design
, J. S. Gero (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ’00, Proceedings of AID’00 Conference, Kluver Academic Publishers, pp. 589-610
|
|
|
|
|
Rosenman, MA., and Gero, JS (1996)
Modelling multiple views of design objects in a collaborative CAD environment
, JS Gero, (guest ed.), Special Issue: Artificial Intelligence in Computer-Aided Design, Computer Aided Design, 28(3): 193-205
|
|
|
|
|
Wix, J. (1997)
ISO 10303 Part 106, BCCM (Building Construction Core Model) /T200 draft
,
|
|
|
|
|
Woodcock, A., Davis, M. (1978)
Catastrophe theory
, Italian Ed., 1982, Garzanti, Milan
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:55 |
|
