id |
2006_810 |
authors |
Dokonal, Wolfgang and Knight,Michael |
year |
2006 |
title |
Pen or PC? - Is Sketching essential to architectural design? |
source |
Communicating Space(s) [24th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9541183-5-9] Volos (Greece) 6-9 September 2006, pp. 810-817 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2006.810
|
summary |
This paper reports on an ongoing student architectural design project that is investigating the differing effects of the use of PC’s or Pens in the design process. We are interested to see whether designing wholly on the computer with a volume modeling software would produce differing results to a traditional design process with a strong basis in 2D sketching. To minimize the influence of the participants previous experience in either the use of PC’s or the pen, we have been working with very young students that have not yet gone through a traditional training on architectural design and CAAD software. This is one of the key aspects of our experimental procedure. We have found that recent software developments in the field of CAAD clearly have and will influence the way architects design and brings the computer as a design tool to the “normal architect”. Until very recently the computer was seen as a design tool almost solely for “computer geeks” in the profession, the majority of architects still using it mainly as a drafting machine or to produce visualizations of their projects after a more ‘conventional’ design process had finished. It is now very clear to us that the ongoing change in technology will have a profound effect on the way all of us will work in future undertaking architectural design. It is an important question for every school of architecture what effect these developments will have on our teaching methods and the curricula. We use the above mentioned ongoing educational project to find out about the benefits and risks of using the computer as a design tool for first year students. |
keywords |
Early Design stages; Collaborative Design; Sketching |
series |
eCAADe |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (391,091 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Daru R. (1991)
Sketch as Sketch Can - Design Sketching with Imperfect Aids and Sketchpads of the Future” Experiences with CAAD in Education and Practice
, eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Munich (Germany)
|
|
|
|
Dokonal W, Knight M, and Brown A. (2004)
To CAAD or not to CAAD?
, SIGraDi 2004 - Proceedings of the 8th Iberoamerican Congress of Digital Graphics, Sao Leopoldo Brazil, pp. 98-100
|
|
|
|
Gross M.D. and Do E.Y.L. (1996)
Demonstrating the Electronic Cocktail Napkin: a paperlike interface for early design
, CHI 96, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, ACM. Conference Companion: 5-6
|
|
|
|
Knight M., Dokonal W., Brown, A. and Hannibal, C. (2005)
Contemporary digital Techniques in the Early stages of Design
, CAADFutures 2005 - Proceedings of the 11th International CAAD Futures Conference, Vienna June 20-22, 2005, pp. 165-174
|
|
|
|
Knight M. (1996)
Architects use of 3D in the design process
, Habitat, journal of the CTI Centre for the Built Environment
|
|
|
|
Rauhala K. (2003)
Playing Games: the Role of Computers in Sketching
, Digital Design [21th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9541183-1-6] Graz (Austria)
|
|
|
|
Schweikardt E. and Gross M.D. (1998)
Digital Clay: Deriving Digital Models from Freehand Sketches
, ACADIA 98. T. Seebohm and S. V. Wyk. Quebec City, Canada, ACADIA: Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 202-211
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:55 |
|