authors |
Gasparski, Wojciech W. |
year |
2002 |
title |
Designer’s Responsibility: Methodological and Ethical Dimensions |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2002.010
|
source |
Connecting the Real and the Virtual - design e-ducation [20th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9541183-0-8] Warsaw (Poland) 18-20 September 2002, pp. 10-011 |
summary |
A designer is anybody who designs, where ‘to design’ - from Latin designare - means ‘to mark out’. Those who design professionally are professional designers, i. e. who „see and seek value in new designs“. Seeing an seeking might be done in two ways: narrower or broader. According to the approach characteristic for design-methodological reductionism those things which are designed are considered the designed objects. In this approach the designer’s task is limited to narrowly understood artifacts like buildings, bridges, machines, devices etc. The relation between a designed object and the reminder of the world is of a secondary consideration or ignored even. The postponed consequences are of physical, social, psychological, and economical nature. Systemic design methodology is different. It describes that ‘what is designed’ in terms of an object of design, a system (a whole) separated from the ‘rest of the world’ to an extent that can minimise a negative ‘immunological effect’. The object of design is a spectem is used. An independently developed programming language entitled NQC (Not Quite C) is used to program the robots. The students are initially given three lectures dealing with robotics in general, methods of locomotion and state based programming principles. Small workshops and discussions about ways of tackling the assigned problem followed these lectures. The work of Rechtin is shown wherein the methodology of “architecting” combines heuristics, hierarchies and intuition to reach design solution spaces. The students are then allowed to form teams whereby they must include members from each faculty. The students are also responsible for forming committees to collectively make decisions about the competitions. The committees decide general attributes of the robots such as size (Constructors Committee) as well as the rules for the competition (Race Committee). The Communication Committee was entrusted to develop a communication protocol (using Infrared transmitters) and the Code Committee decided whuse. Once producing and teaching good science is the main tasks of scholars, those among the scholars who are involved in design science are responsible not only for producing good design science but also for educating designers as reflective practitioners conscious of what every designer should know about objects of design and ethics related to the profession. |
series |
eCAADe |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf_ (27,587 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B. (2000)
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, Vol. 1
, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. - London, England
|
|
|
|
Bunge, M. (1985)
Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 7, Part II
, Life Science, Social Science and Technology, Reidel, Dordrecht
|
|
|
|
Bunge, M. (1985)
Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 8
, Reidel, Dordrecht
|
|
|
|
Collen, A. and Gasparski, W.W. (eds.) (1995)
Design & Systems: General Applications of Methodology, Transaction
, New Brunswick (U.S.A.) - London (U. K.)
|
|
|
|
Gasparski, W. (1993)
Design, Science and Philosophy: The Praxiological Approach
, M. J. de Vries, N. Cross, D. P. Grant, eds., Design Methodology and Relationships with Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht
|
|
|
|
Gasparski, W. (2000)
Aesthetic Considerations in Evaluating Technical Products: Selected Issues of Design Methodology
, R. Trappl, ed., Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. 1, Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna, pp. 269-274
|
|
|
|
Gasparski, W. (2002)
Good, Evil, and Technology: Towards a Design of an Engineering Ethics Course
, R. Trappl, ed., Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. 1, Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna, pp. 251-256
|
|
|
|
Hart, J. (1997)
Ethics and Technology: Innovation and Transformation in Community Context
, The Pilgrim Press, Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
|
|
Humphreys, K.K. (1999)
What Every Engineer Should Know About Ethics
, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York - Basel
|
|
|
|
Martin, M.W. and Schinzinger, R. (1983)
Ethics in Engineering
, McGraw-Hill, New York
|
|
|
|
Mitcham, C. (1994)
Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy
, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
|
|
|
|
Schön, D.A. (1987)
Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions
, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco - London
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:51 |
|