authors |
Cha, Myung Yeol and Gero, John |
year |
1999 |
title |
Style Learning: Inductive Generalisation of Architectural Shape Patterns |
source |
Architectural Computing from Turing to 2000 [eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9523687-5-7] Liverpool (UK) 15-17 September 1999, pp. 629-644 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.1999.629
|
summary |
Art historians and critics have defined the style as common features appeared in a class of objects. Abstract common features from a set of objects have been used as a bench mark for date and location of original works. Common features in shapes are identified by relationships as well as physical properties from shape descriptions. This paper will focus on how the computer recognises common shape properties from a class of shape objects to learn style. Shape representation using schema theory has been explored and possible inductive generalisation from shape descriptions has been investigated. |
keywords |
Style, Inductive Generalisation, Knowledge Representation, Shape |
series |
eCAADe |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (2,667,724 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Arnheim, R. (1954)
Art and Visual Perception
, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles
|
|
|
|
Atkinson, R. and Banegal, H. (1926)
Theory and Elements of Architecture
, Benn, London
|
|
|
|
Cha, M.Y. and Gero, J.S. (1998)
Shape pattern representation for design computation
, Working Paper, Key Centre of Design Computing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
|
Chan, C.S. (1992)
Exploring individual style throughWright’s design
, The Journal of Architectural andPlanning Research, 93: pp.207-238
|
|
|
|
Ching, F.D. (1979)
Architecture: Form, Space &Order
, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
|
|
|
|
Coyne, R.D. (1988)
Logic Models of Design
, Pitman, London
|
|
|
|
Dietterich, T.G. and Michalski, R.S. (1983)
Acomparative review of selected methods for learning from examples
, R. S. Michalski, J. G.Carbonell and T. M. Mitchell eds, MachineLearning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Tiaga Publishing Company, Palo Alto, California, pp. 41-81
|
|
|
|
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D. and Gentner, D. (19??)
The structure-mapping engine: algorithm and examples
, Artificial Intelligence, 41: 1-63
|
|
|
|
Gero, J.S. and Jun, H.J. (1995)
Getting computers to read the architectural semantics of drawings
, L. Kalisperis and B. Kolarevic eds, Computing in Design: Enabling, Capturing and Sharing Ideas,ACADIA’95, pp.97-112
|
|
|
|
Gero, J.S. and Yan, M. (1994)
Shape emergence bysymbolic reasoning
, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21: 191-218
|
|
|
|
Gombrich, E.H. (1960)
Art and Illusion: a Study inthe Psychology of Pictorial Representation
, Pantheon Books, London
|
|
|
|
Kohler, W. (1930)
Gestalt Psychology
, G. Bell and Sons, London
|
|
|
|
Krier, R. (1983)
Elements of Architecture
, AD Publications, London
|
|
|
|
March, L. and Steadman, P. (1971)
The Geometry of Environment: Mathematics and Science in Design
, RIBA Publications Limited, London
|
|
|
|
March, L. (1984)
The logic of design
, N. Cross ed., Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley& Sons, New York
|
|
|
|
Markman, E.M. (1989)
Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction
, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
Marshall, S.P. (1995)
Schemas in Problem Solving
, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
|
|
|
|
Michalski, R.S. (1983)
A theory and methodology of inductive learning
, T. M. Mitchell, J. G. Carbonelland R. S. Michalski eds, Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Morgan Kaufman,Paolo Alto, California, pp. 83-127
|
|
|
|
Minsky, M. (1975)
A framework for representing knowledge
, P.H. Winston ed., The Psychologyof Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp.211-277
|
|
|
|
Mitchell, W.J. (1990)
The Logic of Architecture: Design, Computation and Cognition
, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:55 |
|