id |
acadia03_018 |
authors |
Kalay, Yehuda E. and Jeong, Yongwook |
year |
2003 |
title |
Collaborative Design Process Simulation Game |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2003.133
|
source |
Connecting >> Crossroads of Digital Discourse [Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design In Architecture / ISBN 1-880250-12-8] Indianapolis (Indiana) 24-27 October 2003, pp. 133-141 |
summary |
Collaboration is an important aspect of the architect’s education. However, it is not amenable to the traditional project-based learning pedagogy that works so well for developing form-making skills. Being a process, rather than a product, it cannot be revealed by judging the results alone, which is often how form-making skills are taught and judged. Rather, the process of collaboration is only evident when the number of the participants exceeds a certain threshold, and when actions taken by other participants affect an individual’s on-going design decisions. The advent of on-line, multi-player simulation games provides an analogy and an opportunity to explore interactive collaborative design pedagogies. Their abstract nature helps focus attention on the core issues of the simulated phenomenon, while the playful nature of a game, as opposed to “work,” encourages immersion and role playing that contribute to the learning process. This paper describes an on-line game for simulating the design collaboration process. It espouses to simulate, exercise, and provide a feel for the social dimension of collaboration, by embedding mutual dependencies that encourage players to engage each other—in adversarial or collaborative manners—to accomplish their goals. Specifically, it is intended to help students understand what collaboration is, why it is necessary, and how it is done. The game is modeled after popular board games like Scrabble and Monopoly: players build “houses” made of colored cubes on a site shared with other players. Actions taken by one player immediately affect his/her neighbors. A carefully constructed set of rules awards or deducts points for every action taken by a player and by his/her neighbors. The rules were constructed in such a manner that players who collaborate (in a variety of ways) stand to gain more points than those who do not. The player with the most points “wins.” |
series |
ACADIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (1,084,685 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Dewey, J. (1957)
Experience and education
, New York: MacMillan
|
|
|
|
Engeli, M. and Mueller, A. (1999)
Digital environments for learning and collaboration, architecture, communication and creativity
, ACADIA 1999, O. Ataman & J. Bermudez, eds.Salt Lake City, UT
|
|
|
|
Fruchter, R. (1998)
Internet-based web-mediated collaborative design and learning environment
, AI in structural engineering, 133-145
|
|
|
|
Hirschberg, U. (1997)
Phase(x) – memetic engineering for architecture
, Proceedings of 15th eCAADe Conference ed, B.Martens,Vienna
|
|
|
|
Hirschberg, U., Schmitt, G., Kurmann, D., Kolarevic, B., Johnson, B.R. and Donath, D. (1999)
The 24 hour design cycle: An experiment in design collaboration over the internet
, CAADRIA 1999, Shanghai, China
|
|
|
|
Peri, C. (2000)
Archville: A distributed VR environment for teaching real-time design collaboration
, ACADIA 2000 M.J. Clayton & G.P. Vasquez De Velasco, eds, Washington, DC
|
|
|
|
Scriver, P. and Wyeld, T.G. (2001)
Exploring contemporary architectural history and theory through games of form and discourse
, Playful design learning Forum 2001, Adelaide University, South Australia
|
|
|
|
Wojtowicz J., Fargas, J., Papazian, P., Davidson, J.N. and Cheng, N. (1993)
Asynchronous architecture
, ACADIA 1993, F. Morgan & R. Pohlman, eds, College Station, TX
|
|
|
|
Woodbury, R.F., Shannon, S.J. and Sterk, T.D. (2001)
What works in a design game? Supported by student reactions to being made to play
, CAADRIA 2001 S. Chase and M. Rosenman, eds, Sydney, Australia, 411-420
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:52 |
|