| id |
ascaad2012_008 |
| authors |
Ambrose, Michael A. and Kristen M. Fry |
| year |
2012 |
| title |
Re:Thinking BIM in the Design Studio - Beyond Tools… Approaching Ways of Thinking |
| source |
CAAD | INNOVATION | PRACTICE [6th International Conference Proceedings of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD 2012 / ISBN 978-99958-2-063-3], Manama (Kingdom of Bahrain), 21-23 February 2012, pp. 71-80 |
| summary |
The application of digital design methods and technologies related to BIM and Integrated Practice Delivery are altering the how and what of architectural design. The way contemporary architecture is conceived and made is being transformed through the digital methods, processes and applications used in BIM. How architectural education and the design studio model evolve to reflect, interpret, translate, or challenge the multiplicitous and simultaneously variable modes of contemporary practice present opportunity and risk to this generation of digital scholars, educators and practitioners. Might we re-conceive the design studio as a venue in which a critical dialogue about how the many facets of architectural design practice are engaged? The possibilities afforded by BIM and Integrated Practice Delivery and digital design technologies are increasingly affecting what we make and simultaneously how we make as architects. Digital modeling of both geometry and information is replacing (or displacing) digital drawing. We see diminishing returns of the value of transforming three-dimensional spatial/formal ideas into two-dimensional conventional abstractions of those complex ideas. This comprehensive thinking promoted by BIM processes is one of the key advantages of using BIM leading to true design innovation. The reiterative learning process of design promoted in BIM promotes a rethinking of design studio education. |
| series |
ASCAAD |
| email |
|
| more |
http://www.ascaad.org/conference/2012/papers/ascaad2012_008.pdf |
| full text |
 file.pdf (463,898 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
CHENG, R. (2006)
 Suggestions for an Integrative Education
, SIGraDi 2010_Proceedings of the 14th Congress of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, pp. Bogotá, Colombia, November 17-19, 2010, pp. 43-46
|
|
|
|
|
CLAYTON, M.J.; OZENER O.; HALIBURTON J. FARIAS F. (2010)
Towards Studio 21: Experiments in Design Education Using BIM
, M. Broshar, N. Strong, and D.S. Friedman 2006. American Institute of Architects: Report on Integrated Practice. Washington DC: The American Institute of Architects. Section 0, 3-7
|
|
|
|
|
FRIEDMAN, D.S. (2006)
Architectural Education and Practice on the Verge
, G.A. Luhan, P. Anzalone, et. Al. 2006. Synthetic Landscapes – ACADIA 2006 Conference Proceedings. Mansfield; The Association for Computer- Aided Design in Architecture, 213-227
|
|
|
|
|
GUIDERA, S.C. (2006)
BIM Applications in Design Studio
, New York: Spoon Press. 3-10
|
|
|
|
|
KOLAREVIC, B. (2003)
Architecture in the Digital Age – Designing and Manufacturing
, M. Broshar, N. Strong, and D.S. Friedman 2006. American Institute of Architects: Report on Integrated Practice. Washington DC: The American Institute of Architects. Section 1, 1-11
|
|
|
|
|
MAYNE, T. (2006)
Change or Perish
, New York: Thomas Yoseloff. 112-134
|
|
|
|
|
PÉREZ-GÓMEZ, A. AND PELLETIER, L. (1997)
Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge
, Unpublished PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
WHITE, J. (1958)
The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space
, Cambridge: The MIT Press
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2012/05/15 20:46 |
|
