id |
ascaad2021_045 |
authors |
Soulikias, Aristofanis; Carmela Cucuzzella, Firdous Nizar, Morteza Hazbei, Sherif Goubran |
year |
2021 |
title |
We Gain a Lot…But What are We Losing? A Critical Exploration of the Implications of Digital Design Technologies on Sustainable Architecture |
source |
Abdelmohsen, S, El-Khouly, T, Mallasi, Z and Bennadji, A (eds.), Architecture in the Age of Disruptive Technologies: Transformations and Challenges [9th ASCAAD Conference Proceedings ISBN 978-1-907349-20-1] Cairo (Egypt) [Virtual Conference] 2-4 March 2021, pp. 293-305 |
summary |
In the field of architecture, new technologies are enabling us to promptly simulate, quantify, and compare multitudes of design alternatives and consider an ever more expanding list of environmental and economic parameters within the early design phases of projects. However, architecture today veers further towards non-neutral technologies, changing our culture, introducing new values, and (re)shaping our social ideals. The change of media, from the manual to the digital, has deeply transformed architecture and city design. There is undoubtedly progress, but what are we losing in this automation, virtualization and over-digitalization? Are architects—creators of space, human experience, and cultural capital—starting to occupy the role of technicians? Sustainable architecture is a field that is already experiencing tensions between the quantitative and the qualitative, the optimum and the ethical, and the parametric and haptic methods. Yet the rapidly evolving CAAD technologies overlook many of the non-quantifiable values of these binaries. Gains in speed and efficiency in the design process with the help of parametric design may be challenging the designer’s reflection-in-action process required for critical architecture while ethical, cultural, and human dimensions can hardly be modelled algorithmically. Similarly, computational thinking and digitalization in architectural education, have yet to come to terms with the loss of analogue ways of learning that favour a more diverse and inclusive classroom environment. Instead of keeping the analogue and the haptic practices away from the immaculate realm of CAAD, this paper argues for hybrid technologies that recognize these practices and their value in sustainable design and incorporate them. Film animation, as a branch of architecture’s most expressive means, film, can serve as a paradigm of a feasible disruptive technology, but most importantly, as an indicator of the hybridity between the handmade and the digital and its effectiveness in expressing vital elements of sustainability that are otherwise dismissed. |
series |
ASCAAD |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (475,742 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Al-Qawasmi, J. (2005)
Digital media in architectural design education: reflections on the e-studio pedagogy
, Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education. 4, 205-222
|
|
|
|
Allen, S. (2009)
Practice: architecture, technique + representation
, London: Routledge
|
|
|
|
Barrios Hernandez, C. R. (2006)
Thinking parametric design: introducing parametric Gaudi
, Design Studies. 27, 309-324
|
|
|
|
Beder, S. (1994)
The role of technology in sustainable development
, IEEE Technology and society magazine, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 14–19
|
|
|
|
Bruno, G. (2014)
Surface
, London: University of Chicago Press
|
|
|
|
Burry, M. (2013)
Scripting cultures: architectural design and programming
, Somerset: Wiley
|
|
|
|
Ceschin, F. And Gaziulusoy, I. (2016)
Eolution of design for sustainability: From Product design to design for system innovations and transitions
, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 47, pp. 118–163
|
|
|
|
Cucuzzella, C. And Goubran, S. (2020)
Caught between measurement and meaning
, Cucuzzella, C. and Goubran, S. Eds. Sustainable architecture –between measurement and meaning.Wilmington, Delaware: Vernon Press, pp. 1–13
|
|
|
|
Dino, I. (2012)
Creative design exploration by parametric generative systems in architecture
, METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 29(1), 207–224
|
|
|
|
Ehrenfeld, J. (2009)
Sustainability by design: a subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture
, New Haven. Conn.: London: Yale University Press
|
|
|
|
Eisenstein, S. M., Bois, Y.-A., And Glenny, M. (1989)
Montage and architecture
, Assemblage (10), 111-131
|
|
|
|
Farmer, G. And Guy, S. (2004)
Hybrid environments: the spaces of sustainable design
, Guy, S. and Moore, S.A. (Eds.), Sustainable architectures: critical explorations of green building practice Europe and North America. 1st ed. New York: Spon Press Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 15–30
|
|
|
|
Farmer, G. And Guy, S. (2005)
Reflection and engagement: towards pluralist practices of sustainable architecture
, Guy, S. and Moore, S.A. Eds. Sustainable architectures: critical explorations of green building practice Europe and North America. 1st ed. New York: Spon Press Taylor & Francis Group
|
|
|
|
Gero, J. S. (1996)
Creativity, emergence and evolution in design
, Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(7), 435–448
|
|
|
|
Goubran, S. (2019)
Sustainability in architectural design projects –a semiotic understanding
, Social Semiotics. Taylor & Francis, Vol. 0 No. 0, pp. 1–27
|
|
|
|
Graham, E. M. (2003)
Studio design critique: student and faculty expectations and reality
, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
|
|
|
|
Grobman, Y. J. And Neuman, E. (2012)
Performalism: Form and Performance in Digital Architecture
, London: Routledge
|
|
|
|
Gross, M., Do, E. (1999)
Integrating digital media in design studio: Six paradigms
, Proceedings of the American College Schools of Architecture Conference. Minneapolis
|
|
|
|
Guy, S. And Farmer, G. (2000)
Contested Constructions: The competing logics of green buildings and ethics
, Fox, W. Ed. Ethics and The Built Environment. London: Routledge pp. 73–87
|
|
|
|
Guy, S. And Farmer, G. (2001)
Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: the place of technology
, Journal of Architectural Education. Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 140–148
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2021/08/09 13:11 |
|