| id |
ascaad2021_071 |
| authors |
Al Maani, Duaa; Saba Alnusairat, Amer Al-Jokhadar |
| year |
2021 |
| title |
Transforming Learning for Architecture: Online Design Studio as New Norm for Crises Adaptation Under COVID-19 |
| source |
Abdelmohsen, S, El-Khouly, T, Mallasi, Z and Bennadji, A (eds.), Architecture in the Age of Disruptive Technologies: Transformations and Challenges [9th ASCAAD Conference Proceedings ISBN 978-1-907349-20-1] Cairo (Egypt) [Virtual Conference] 2-4 March 2021, pp. 129-141 |
| summary |
For students, studying architecture necessitates a fundamental shift in learning mode and attitude in the transition from school. Beginner students are often surprised by the new mode of learning-by-doing and the new learner identity that they must adopt and adapt to in the design studio. Moreover, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, architecture teaching has moved online. Both instructors and students are experiencing dramatic changes in their modes of teaching and learning due to the sudden move from on-campus design studios to a virtual alternative, with only the bare minimum of resources and relevant experience. This study explored the virtual design studio as a transformative learning model for disaster and resilience context, including the factors that affect foundation students’ perceptions and experiences of the quality of this adaptation. Data obtained from 248 students who took online design studios during the lockdown in 15 universities in Jordan highlight many factors that make the experience of the online design studio more challenging. Despite these challenges, strongly positive aspects of the online studio were evident and widely discussed. A model of hyper-flexible design studio in which students can have a direct contact with their instructors when needed – in addition to online activities, reviews, and written feedback – is highly recommended for the beginner years. This HyFlex model will enrich students’ learning and understanding of the fundamentals of design and ensure that technology solutions deliver significant and sustainable benefits. |
| series |
ASCAAD |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (558,611 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Al Maani, D. (2019)
 Exploring transition toward independent learning: student experiences in the first year of architecture school
, Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University, UK
|
|
|
|
|
Alharthi, A.D., Spichkova, M., And Hamilton, M. (2019)
Sustainability requirements for eLearning systems: a systematic literature review and analysis
, Requirements engineering, 24(4), 523-543
|
|
|
|
|
Alnusairat, S., Al Maani, D. And Al-Jokhadar, A. (2020)
Architecture students' satisfaction with and perceptions of online design studios during COVID-19 lockdown: the case of Jordan universities
, Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research
|
|
|
|
|
Angelou, G.N., And Economides, A.A. (2007)
E-learning investment risk management
, Information resources management journal, 20(4), 80-104
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony, K. (1991)
Juries on trial: analysis and critique of design juries and studios
, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
|
|
|
|
|
Atkinson, S.P. (2015)
Adaptive learning and learning analytics: a new learning design paradigm
, BPP Working Paper, January, 1-9
|
|
|
|
|
Broadfoot, O., And Bennett, R. (2003)
Design studios: online? comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios
, The Apple University consortium academic and developers conference: digital voyages, 28 September -1 October 2003, University of Adelaide, South Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Casanova, D., And Price, L. (2018)
Moving towardssustainable policy and practice: a five level framework for online learning sustainability
, Canadian journal of learning and technology, 44(3), 1-20
|
|
|
|
|
Challis, D. (2002)
Integrating the conceptual and practice worlds: a case study from architecture
, Quality conversations: research and development in higher education, 25, 106-113
|
|
|
|
|
Clune, S. (2014)
Design for sustainability and the design studio
, Fusion journal, 3
|
|
|
|
|
Dutton, T.A. (1987)
Design and studio pedagogy
, Journal of architectural education, 41(1), 16-25
|
|
|
|
|
Dutton, T.A. (1991)
The hidden curriculum and the design studio: toward a critical studio pedagogy
, Voices in architectural education: cultural politics and pedagogy, 165-194
|
|
|
|
|
El-Bakry, H.M., And Mastorakis, N. (2009)
E-Learning and management information systems for e-universities
, The 13th WSEAS international conference on computers, 555–565
|
|
|
|
|
Hall, L. (2015)
Building resilience for lifelong learning
, Fine print, 38(2), 18-22
|
|
|
|
|
Jati, G. (2013)
Learning management system (Moodle) and e-learning content development
, Jurnal sosioteknologi, 12(28), 277-289
|
|
|
|
|
Kahu, E., Nelson, K., And Picton, C. (2017)
Student interest as a key driver of engagement for first year students
, Student success, 8(2), 55-66
|
|
|
|
|
Knowles, M.S. (1988)
Preface
, BOUD, D., ed. Developingstudentautonomy in learning. Routledge
|
|
|
|
|
Koch, A., Schwennsen, K., Dutton, T.A., And Smith, D. (2002)
The redesign of studio culture: A report of the AIAS studio culture task force
, American Institute of Architecture Students
|
|
|
|
|
Ledewitz, S. (1985)
Models of designin studio teaching
, Journal of architectural education, 38(2), 2-8
|
|
|
|
|
Light, G., Calkins, S., And Cox, R. (2009)
Learning and teaching in higher education: the reflective professional
, Sage
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2021/08/09 13:13 |
|
