CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References
id caadria2007_233
authors Hoseini, Ali Ghaffarian; Rahinah Ibrahim
year 2007
title Using Social Network Analysis for Visualising Spatial Planning During Conceptual Design Phase
source CAADRIA 2007 [Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia] Nanjing (China) 19-21 April 2007
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2007.x.i8r
summary Spatial diagramming exercises with clients are difficult when most clients are not able to visualize the end results of their requirements. This paper would like to introduce a computational tool—Social Network Analysis (SNA)—commonly used in the communications field to study relationships between people we believe can resolve this visualization problem. Our research intent is to affirm whether or not we can use SNA as a spatial planning tool during conceptual building design. We posit that since the nodes and structural relationships between the nodes may have similar architectural characteristics, the tool would enable architects to make changes by moving any spaces on a floor plan while safely maintaining their spatial relationships to other spaces. In this paper, we would like to develop a proof-of-concept model using an available SNA tool to facilitate spatial diagramming visualization during conceptual design phase. We tested the use of a SNA tool at four levels. The first level determined whether we could develop spatial relationship between functional spaces (such as the living room must be adjacent to the front entry). The second level is on setting priorities values for the different nodes and the linkages. The third level determined whether we could develop grouping relationship between several functional spaces that have a common characteristic (such as public versus private spaces) on one horizontal plane. The final fourth level determined whether we could develop multiple layers that are connected by one common connector (such as a staircase in a double-story house). Our models are validated intellectually by visual comparison between our model and another diagramming by Nooshin (2001) that was developed manually. We are most interested in the fourth level because complexity in the spatial diagramming exercises is caused by multi-layered spatial arrangements at the horizontal and vertical planes. We expect our study to provide us guidelines in developing a prototype for a spatial diagramming tool using SNA, which architects can use to resolve visualization problems when conducting the exercise with their clients.
series CAADRIA
email
full text file.pdf (156,313 bytes)
references Content-type: text/plain
Details Citation Select
100%; open Akin, O (1986) Find in CUMINCAD Psychology of Architectural Design , Pion Ltd, London

100%; open Biggs, N.; Lloyd, E. and Wilson, R. (1986) Find in CUMINCAD Graph Theory, 1736-1936 , Oxford University Press

100%; open Caroline Haythornthwaite (1998) Find in CUMINCAD Social Network Analysis-An Approach and Technique for the Study of Information Exchange , LISR 18, 323-342

100%; open Everett, M.G. and S.P. Borgatti (1999) Find in CUMINCAD The centrality of groups and classes , Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 23 (3): 181-201

100%; open Hartmann and Weigt (2006) Find in CUMINCAD Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Optimization Problems , Section 3: Introduction to Graphs

100%; open Hill, R. and Dunbar (2002) Find in CUMINCAD Social Network Size in Humans , Human Nature, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 53-72

100%; open Ibrahim, R., M. Shumate, R. Levitt, and N. Contractor (2005) Find in CUMINCAD Discontinuity in organizations--Knowledge flow behaviors in sequential workflow processes , CRGP Working Paper No. 17, Stanford University

100%; open Krackhardt (1988) Find in CUMINCAD Predicting with networks-Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data , Social Network. 10: 359-381

100%; open Lawson, B (1990) Find in CUMINCAD How Designers Think? , Butterworth Architecture, London (2nd Ed)

100%; open Mark D Gross (1996) Find in CUMINCAD A computational environment for working with design diagrams , Design Studies Volt 17 No 1, pp 53-69

100%; open Schon, D A (1983) Find in CUMINCAD The Reflective Practitioner-How professionals think in action , Basic Books, New York

100%; open Scott A. Arvin, Donald H. House (2002) Find in CUMINCAD Modeling architectural design objectives in physically based space planning , Automation in Construction 11 ˇ. pp 213–225

100%; open Scott, J. (2000) Find in CUMINCAD Social Network Analysis: A Handbook 2nd Ed , Newberry Park, CA: Sage

100%; open Thomsen, J., R. E. Levitt, J. C. Kunz, C. I. Nass, and D. B. Fridsma (1999) Find in CUMINCAD A trajectory for validating computational emulation models of organizations , Journal of Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 5 (4) Dec: 385-401

100%; open Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994) Find in CUMINCAD Social Network Analysis , Cambridge University Press

100%; open Zafer Bildai, John S Gero and Terry Puecell (2006) Find in CUMINCAD To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question , Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

last changed 2022/06/07 07:50
pick and add to favorite papersHOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_225387 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002