id |
caadria2007_301 |
authors |
Barrow, Larry; Shaima Al Arayedh |
year |
2007 |
title |
Emerging Technololgy – Dilemma and Opportunities in Housing |
source |
CAADRIA 2007 [Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia] Nanjing (China) 19-21 April 2007 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2007.x.d7c
|
summary |
Digital Technology has transformed industrial manufacturing and production; and an array of Industrial Design products provide increasing comfort and benefit to millions of global citizens via ergonomic and mass production/customization strategies. Yet, housing needs of a rapidly growing global population are rarely affected by digital technology. Shifts in societal demographics, from rural to urban city centres, and concurrently Global Warming and ecological changes are exacerbating the world housing situation. Millions are homeless, live in inadequate shelter, or as in the US Manufactured Housing (MH) market, live in nondurable poor quality “manufactured” houses that are detrimental to health, at best, or during extreme weather events, suffer catastrophic damages often resulting in death to occupants. Nevertheless, housing concepts and related living units have benefited very little when compared to architecture’s related manufacturing industries counter-parts (i.e. automotive, aerospace, marine industries, etc). While Technology has vividly expanded the shape language of architecture (i.e. Free-Form-Design), some may argue that Free-Form- Design buildings generally have beauty that is only “skin deep” and typically focus on providing signature statements for both the designer and elite clientele. In this paper, we will briefly review the role of the architect in the US Manufactured Housing industry; additionally, we will identify the major problems that plaque the US Manufactured Housing Industry. Further, we will review how architects and Industrial Designers use technology in their respective fields and draw larger designmanufacture principals for issues of global housing. Our findings and analysis suggest that an Industrial Design approach, applied in architecture for mass housing, offers a means of improving the architect’s role and technology in manufactured housing for the masses. |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (166,146 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Barrow, L (2005)
Little “d” and BIG “D” Design
, Architectural Research Centers Consortium, National Convention. Mississippi State University; April 2005
|
|
|
|
Herbert, G. (1984)
The Dream of the Factory-Made House
, The MIT Press, 1984, P.3
|
|
|
|
Jarvinen, J. and Koskinen, L. (2001)
Industrial Design as a Culturally Reflexive Activity in Manufacturing
, University of Art and Design, Helsinki
|
|
|
|
McDonough, W., Braungart, M. (2002)
Cradle to Cradle
, North Point Press
|
|
|
|
NAHB Research Centre (1998)
Factory and Site Built Housing; A Comparison for the 21PstP Century
, US Department of Housing & Urban Development
|
|
|
|
NFO Research Inc. (1999)
National Survey of Mobile Home Owners
, AARP, p.23
|
|
|
|
Ritchie, I. M., Lehnen R. G. (1987)
Formaldehyde Related Health Complaints of residents living in Mobile and Conventional Homes
, American Journal of Public Health
|
|
|
|
Shodek, D., Bechthold, M., Griggs, K., Kao, M., and Steinberg, M. (2005)
Digital Design and Manufacturing
, John Wiley & Sons, p.29
|
|
|
|
Sullivan, B.J. (1979)
Industrialization in The Building Industry
, Uniworld Industries, p.33
|
|
|
|
US administration National Fire Data center (2004)
Fire in the United States 1992-2001
, Thirteenth Addition
|
|
|
|
Wind, J. and Rangaswamy, A (1999)
Customerization: The Second Revolution in Mass Customization
, E-Business research Center
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:50 |
|