| id |
caadria2011_065 |
| authors |
Paulini, Mercedes; Mary Lou Maher and Paul Murty |
| year |
2011 |
| title |
The role of collective intelligence in design: A protocol study of online design communication |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2011.687
|
| source |
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia / The University of Newcastle, Australia 27-29 April 2011, pp. 687-696 |
| summary |
Web-enabled collective intelligence in design invites anyone to contribute to a design process through crowd-sourcing. We use a protocol analysis method to analyse the forum data on a collective intelligence web site, studying communication among individuals who are motivated to participate in the design process. A protocol analysis allows us to compare collective intelligence in design to similar studies of individual and team design. Our analysis shows that a design process that includes collective intelligence shares processes of ideation and evaluation with individual and team design, and also includes a significant amount of social networking. Including collective intelligence in design can extend the typical design team to include potential users and amateur perspectives that direct the design to be more sensitive to users’ needs and social issues, and can serve a marketing purpose. |
| keywords |
Collective intelligence; design process; protocol analysis; design communication |
| series |
CAADRIA |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (578,043 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Bloch, P.H. (1995)
 Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response
, The J. of Marketing 59(3): 16–29
|
|
|
|
|
Cross, N., Christiaans, H., and Dorst, K. (1996)
Analysing Design Activity
, John Wiley and Sons, New York
|
|
|
|
|
Dorst, K. and Dijkhuis, J. (1995)
Comparing Paradigms for Describing Design Activity
, Design Studies 16(2): 261–274
|
|
|
|
|
Gabriel, G. and Maher, M. L. (2000)
An analysis of design communication with and without computer mediation
, Proceedings of Co-Designing 2000, 329–337
|
|
|
|
|
Gero, J.S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2007)
A Function-Behaviour-Structure ontology of processes
, AIEDAM 21(3): 295–308
|
|
|
|
|
Howe, J. (2009)
Crowd-sourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business
, Three Rivers Press, New York
|
|
|
|
|
Maher, M.L., Paulini, M. and Murty, P. (2010)
Scaling up: From individual design to collaborative design to collective design
, JS Gero (Ed) Design Computing and Cognition DCC’10, Springer, pp. 581–600
|
|
|
|
|
McGonigal, J. (2008)
Why I love bees: A case study in collective intelligence gaming
, K. Salen (Ed) The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, 199–227
|
|
|
|
|
Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B. (2009)
The Reader-to-Leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation
, AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1(1): 13–32.
|
|
|
|
|
Sharon, E., Beatty, P., Homer, L. and Kahle, R. (1988)
The involvement-commitment model: Theory and implications
, J. of Business Research 16(2): 149–167
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:59 |
|
