id |
caadria2014_022 |
authors |
Dorta, Tomás and Gokce Kinayoglu |
year |
2014 |
title |
Towards a New Representational Ecosystem for the Design Studio |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2014.699
|
source |
Rethinking Comprehensive Design: Speculative Counterculture, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2014) / Kyoto 14-16 May 2014, pp. 699–708 |
summary |
The collection of visual and physical simulation tools available to a design team constitutes what can be termed the Representational Ecosystem of the design studio. Current digital paradigm does not effectively support design discussions because it is limited to the pictorial-frame and scaled representations. We analyzed for the first time the link between the Interconnected Hybrid Ideation Space (HIS) and the representational ecosystem of a design studio as a case study. The Hybrid Representational Ecosystem is proposed to better achieve a comprehensive and closer view of the design solution because it is fully hybrid (analog/digital), it supports multiple kinds of representations, scales, and co-design. The epistemology and principles of the new paradigm are described. |
keywords |
Co-design; Studio; Representation; Immersion; Ideation |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (1,936,816 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
(1988 )
An ethnographic perspective on engineering design
, Design Studies, 9(3), 159–168
|
|
|
|
(2004 )
Variations on a virtual design studio
, Proceedings of Fourth International Workshop on CSCW in Design, Universite_ de Technologie de Compiegne, France, 159–165
|
|
|
|
(2012 )
Collaboration and design education through the interconnected HIS
, Achten, H. et al. (eds.) Physical Digitality: Proceedings of the eCAADe, 2, Prague, Czech Republic, 97–105
|
|
|
|
Dorta, T. (2007 )
Implementing and assessing the Hybrid Ideation Space: A cognitive artefact for conceptual design
, International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 14(2), 119–133
|
|
|
|
Dorta, T.; Kalay, Y.; Lesage, A. and Perez, E. (2011 )
Elements of design conversation in the interconnected HIS
, International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 18(2), 65–80
|
|
|
|
Gero, J. S., and Kannengiesser, U. (2012 )
Representational affordances in design, with examples from analogy making and optimization
, Research in Engineering Design, 23(3), 235–249
|
|
|
|
Kvan, T. (2009 )
Debating opportunities: Learning design through different structures
, Wang, X., and Schnabel, M. A. (eds.) Mixed Reality in architecture, design and construction. Springer, Netherlands, 227–236
|
|
|
|
Oxman, R. (1997 )
Design by re-representation: a model of visual reasoning in design
, Design Studies, 18(4), 329–347
|
|
|
|
Schnabel, M. A. (2011 )
Immersive Virtual Environment design studio
, Wang, X. and Jen-Hung, J. (eds.) Collaborative Design in Virtual Environments, Springer, Netherlands, 177–192
|
|
|
|
Schön, D. A. (1992 )
Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation
, Knowledge Based Systems, 5(1), 3–14
|
|
|
|
Simon, H. A. (1973 )
Structure of ill-Structured Problems
, Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:55 |
|