| id |
caadria2016_861 |
| authors |
Gero, John S.; Jennifer Shields and Rongrong Yu |
| year |
2016 |
| title |
How veridical are different modalities of digital representation? - The effect of presentation modality on physiological response |
| source |
Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2016) / Melbourne 30 March–2 April 2016, pp. 861-870 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2016.861
|
| summary |
This paper presents the methodology and results of a pilot study comparing the eye movements of architecture students when looking at different modalities of digital spatial representation. The two participant groups consisted of third and fourth year undergradu- ate architecture students from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA and from Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China. The two modalities studied were a computer-generated line drawn perspective and a digitized photograph of the same architectur- al space. The results of this study show that student designers’ physio- logical response varies with different representation modalities. |
| keywords |
Eye movement: spatial representation; modalities of spatial representation; designers’ physiological response |
| series |
CAADRIA |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (1,103,413 bytes) |
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:51 |
