id |
caadria2017_003 |
authors |
Loh, Paul and Leggett, David |
year |
2017 |
title |
Tools as Agents in Design and Making Processes |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2017.799
|
source |
P. Janssen, P. Loh, A. Raonic, M. A. Schnabel (eds.), Protocols, Flows, and Glitches - Proceedings of the 22nd CAADRIA Conference, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China, 5-8 April 2017, pp. 799-808 |
summary |
The inversion of knowledge structure in electronics prototyping platform has allowed designers and architects to design and build reasonably stable mechatronic systems to aid novel material production; these new and hacked computer numeric controlled (CNC) machines are used to explore emerging material constructs and facilitate generative design processes. This paper examines tool making and questions the agentive capacity of such tools in design processes through a case study of a bespoke CNC machine which uses vacuum thermoforming techniques. Through understanding the agentive capacity of CNC tools, the authors suggest that the knowledge structure of tool making is distinctly different from fabrication workflow. This paper proposes an alternative means of understanding the capacity of CNC tools in the design and making process. |
keywords |
Digital Fabrication; Tool Making; Electronics Prototyping; Digital Workflow |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (3,944,182 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Ameijde, J and Carlin, B (2012)
Digital Construction: Automated Design and Construction Experiments Using Customised On-Site Digital Devices
, Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe Conference, pp 439-446
|
|
|
|
Anderson, C (2014)
Makers: The New Industrial Revolution
, Crown Pub Inc
|
|
|
|
Braumann, J and Brell-Cokcan, S (2012)
Digital and Physical Computing for Industrial Robots in Architecture
, Proceedings of CAADRIA 2012, pp 317-326
|
|
|
|
Burry, M (2011)
Scripting Cultures: Architectural Design and Programming
, Wiley & Sons
|
|
|
|
Callon, M and Latour, B (1981)
Unscrewing the Big Leviathan
, Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Intergration of Micro- and Macro-Sociology, -, pp 277-303
|
|
|
|
Davis, D (2013)
Modelled on Software Engineering: Flexible Parametric Models in the Practice of architecture
, PhD Thesis, RMIT University
|
|
|
|
Fischer, T (2008)
Designing (tools (for designing (tools (for ))))
, PhD Thesis, RMIT University
|
|
|
|
Gramazio, F and Kohler, M (2008)
Digital materiality in architecture
, Lars Mu??ller Publishers
|
|
|
|
Loh, P, Burry, J and Wagenfeld, M (2016)
Reconsidering Pye's theory of making through digital craft practice
, Craft Research, 7(2), pp 187-206
|
|
|
|
Loh, P (2015)
Articulated timber ground, making pavilion as pedagogy
, Proceeding of CAADRIA 2015, pp 23-32
|
|
|
|
Malafouris, L (2016)
How Things Shape the Mind
, The MIT Press
|
|
|
|
Male-Alemany, M and Portell, J (2014)
Soft Tolerance: An Approach for Additive Construction on Site
, Architectural Design, 84(1), pp 122-127
|
|
|
|
Nafus, D and Beckwith, R (2016)
Number in craft:Situated numbering practice in Do-It-Yourself sensor systems
, Weber, C and DeNicola, A (eds), Critical Craft, Bloomsbury
|
|
|
|
Pye, D (1974)
The Nature & Art of Workmanship
, A & C Black
|
|
|
|
Ratti, C (2015)
Open Source Architecture
, Thames & Hudson Ltd
|
|
|
|
Ratto, M (2011)
Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life
, The Information Society, 27(4), pp 252-260
|
|
|
|
Sanders, EBN and Stappers, PJ (2014)
Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning
, CoDesign, 10(1), pp 5-14
|
|
|
|
Snooks, R (2016)
Behavioural composites and robotic fabrication
, Bates, D, Mitsogianni, V and Ramirez-Lovering, D (eds), Studio Futures, Uro Publications
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:59 |
|