| id |
caadria2017_155 |
| authors |
Cichocka, Judyta Maria, Browne, Will Neil and Rodriguez, Edgar |
| year |
2017 |
| title |
Optimization in the Architectural Practice - An International Survey |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2017.387
|
| source |
P. Janssen, P. Loh, A. Raonic, M. A. Schnabel (eds.), Protocols, Flows, and Glitches - Proceedings of the 22nd CAADRIA Conference, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China, 5-8 April 2017, pp. 387-396 |
| summary |
For several years great effort has been devoted to the study of Architectural Design Optimization (ADO). However, although in the recent years ADO has attracted much attention from academia, optimization methods and tools have had a limited influence on the architectural profession. The aim of the study is to reveal users' expectations from the optimization tools and define limitations preventing wide-spread adaptation of the optimization solvers in the architectural practice. The paper presents the results of the survey "Optimization in the architectural practice" conducted between December 2015 and February 2016 on 165 architectural trainees and practising architects from 34 countries. The results show that there is a need for an interactive multi-objective optimization tool, as 78% respondents declared that a multi-objective optimization is more necessary in their practice than a single objective one and 91% of them acknowledged the need for choice of promising solutions during optimization process. Finally, it has been found that daylight, structure and geometry are three top factors which architects are interested in optimizing. |
| keywords |
Architectural Design Optimization; Optimizaiton Techniques; Generic Solvers; Multi-criteria Decision Making |
| series |
CAADRIA |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (2,145,299 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Aly, M and Nassar, K (2013)
 Integrating performance and parametric design tools for urban daylight enhancement
, Proceedings of BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Le Bourget Du Lac, France, p 3027-3034
|
|
|
|
|
Cichocka, JM, Browne, WN and Rodriguez, E (2015)
Evolutionary Optimization Processes As Design Tools :
, Proceedings of 31th International PLEA Conference ARCHITECTURE IN (R)EVOLUTION, Bologna 9-11 September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Flager, F and Haymaker, J (2009)
A comparison of two multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation programmes for fibromyalgia: A register linkage study on work disability
, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(1), pp 66-72
|
|
|
|
|
Martyn, D (2009)
Rhino Grasshopper
, AEC Magazine, 42(May/ June), pp 14-15
|
|
|
|
|
Rutten, D (2013)
Galapagos: On the Logic and Limitations of Generic Solvers
, Architectural Design, 83(2), pp 132-135
|
|
|
|
|
Vierlinger, R (2013)
Multi Objective Design Interface
, PhD Thesis, Technischen Universitat Wien
|
|
|
|
|
Wortmann, T and Nannicini, G (2016)
Black-box optimisation methods for architectural design
, S Chien, S Choo, M A Schnabel, W Nakapan, M J Kim, S R (ed) Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA 2016, Hong Kong:, p 177-186
|
|
|
|
|
Wortmann, T, Costa, A, Nannicini, G and Schroepfer, T (2015)
Advantages of surrogate models for architectural design optimization
, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 29(4), pp 471-481
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:56 |
|
