| id |
caadria2019_350 |
| authors |
Tomarchio, Ludovica, Hasler, Stephanie, Herthogs, Pieter, Müller, Johannes, Tunçer, Bige and He, Peijun |
| year |
2019 |
| title |
Using an Online Participation Tool to Collect Relevant Data for Urban Design - The construction of two participation exercices |
| source |
M. Haeusler, M. A. Schnabel, T. Fukuda (eds.), Intelligent & Informed - Proceedings of the 24th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 2, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 15-18 April 2019, pp. 747-756 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2019.2.747
|
| summary |
This paper discusses the design of an online digital participation campaign, developed as an academic research project in Singapore. In order to develop appropriate exercises which fitted the tool and the context, we addressed several questions: how can online participation tools maintain a negotiation and education power? What data generated by citizens, in the form of a design proposals, is useful for urban design? We created two different exercises, at different scales: one exercise asking people to design proposals with functional blocks and one where citizens could decide the equipment and furniture in a public space. For each exercise we discuss the scale, the elements, the educating and mediating impact, but also the way we intended to use the gathered local knowledge in urban design. The exercise did not receive the expected contributions, gathering little attention from internet users. More results were obtained using an offline experimental setup. In conclusion, we reconsider the weakest points of the design in a critical analysis and provide direction for future online participation tools. |
| keywords |
participation; urban design ; online tool; engagement |
| series |
CAADRIA |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (2,375,371 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Brandsen, T and Honingh, M (2016)
 Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions
, Public Administration Review, 3, pp. 427-435
|
|
|
|
|
Charalabidis, Y and Koussouris, S (eds) (2012)
Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making
, Springer
|
|
|
|
|
Evans-Cowley, J and Hollander, J (2010)
The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-based Participation Tools
, Planning Practice & Research, 25 (3), p. 397?408
|
|
|
|
|
Falco, E and Kleinhans, R (2018)
Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement
, International Journal of Information Management, 40, pp. pp.17-20
|
|
|
|
|
Falco, E and Reinout, K (2018)
Digital Participatory Platforms for Co- Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review.
, International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 7 (3), p. 28
|
|
|
|
|
Hasler, S, Chenal, J and Soutter, M (2017)
Digital Tools as a Means to Foster Inclusive, Data-informed Urban Planning
, Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5, pp. 230-239
|
|
|
|
|
He, P, Herthogs, P, Cinelli, M, Tomarchio, L and Tuncer, B (2018)
A multiple criteria analysis-based framework to evaluate public space quality
, Proceedings of Smart and Sustainable Built Environment (SASBE) 2018, Sidney
|
|
|
|
|
Herthogs, P, Tuncer, B, Schläpfer, M and He, P (2018)
A multiple criteria analysis-based framework to evaluate public space quality
, Proceedings of eCAAde 2018, Lodz
|
|
|
|
|
Linders, D (2012)
From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media
, Government Information Quarterly, 29, pp. 446-454
|
|
|
|
|
Manovich, L (2000)
Database as a genre of new media
, AI & Society, 2, pp. 176-183
|
|
|
|
|
Muller, J, Hangxin, L, Chirkin, A, Klein, B and Schmitt, G (2018)
Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design
, Cities, 72, pp. 181-188
|
|
|
|
|
Sander, M, Georgi, C, Heijne, K, Klamert, K, Noennig, JR, Pump, M, Stelzle, B and an der Meer, H (2017)
How to involve inhabitants in urban design planning by using digital tools? An overview on a state of the art, key challenges and promising approaches
, Procedia Computer Science, Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference, Marseille
|
|
|
|
|
Seltzer, E and Mahmoudi, D (2013)
Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning
, Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), pp. 3-18
|
|
|
|
|
Wates, N (2000)
The community planning handbook: how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world
, Earthscan, London
|
|
|
|
|
You, L, Tuncer, B and Xing, H (2018)
Harnessing Multi-source Data about Public Sentiments and Activities for Informed Design
, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1-1, p. 99
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:58 |
|
