| id |
caadria2020_089 |
| authors |
Poinet, Paul, Stefanescu, Dimitrie and Papadonikolaki, Eleni |
| year |
2020 |
| title |
Web-Based Distributed Design to Fabrication Workflows |
| source |
D. Holzer, W. Nakapan, A. Globa, I. Koh (eds.), RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans - Proceedings of the 25th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 1, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5-6 August 2020, pp. 95-104 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2020.1.095
|
| summary |
As architectural design projects tend to tackle larger scales and become more complex, multiple involved actors often need to work from different remote locations. This increased complexity impacts the digital design-to-fabrication workflows that become more challenging, as each actor involved in a project operates on different software environments and needs to access precise fabrication data of specific design components. Consequently, managing and keeping track of design changes throughout the design-to-fabrication workflow still remains a challenge for all actors involved. This paper discusses how this challenge can be tackled through both Speckle, a complete open source data platform for the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC), and SpeckleViz, a custom web-based interactive Activity Network Diagram (AND) built upon Speckle. SpeckleViz continuously maps data transfers across design and building processes, enabling the end-users to explore, interact and get a better understanding of the constantly evolving digital design workflows. This is demonstrated in this paper through a computational design and digital fabrication workshop conducted at the Centro de Estudios Superiores de Diseño de Monterrey (CEDIM), during which an integrative, file-less collaborative design workflow has been set through Speckle, connecting different Rhino-Grasshopper sessions acting as discrete computational design pipelines. |
| keywords |
Collaborative Workflows; Distributed Design; Activity Network Diagram; Data Flow |
| series |
CAADRIA |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (1,877,868 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Balaji, SB and Murugaiyan, SM (2012)
 Waterfall vs V-Model vs Agile: A Comparative Study on SDLC
, International Journal of Information Technology & Business Management, 2(1), pp. 26-30
|
|
|
|
|
Biggs, N, Lloyd, EK and Wilson, RJ (1976)
Graph Theory 1736-1936
, Oxford University Press, New York, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Burry, JB and Holzer, DH (2009)
Sharing Design Space: Remote Concurrent Shared Parametric Modeling
, Proceedings of eCAADe 2009, Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, pp. 333-340
|
|
|
|
|
Davies, AD (2019)
Project management for large, complex projects
, Association for Project Management, Princes Risborough
|
|
|
|
|
De Vries, BDV (1995)
Message Development in the Building Process
, Modeling of Buildings through their Life-Cycle, Proceedings of the CIB w78 Conference, Standford, pp. 467-479
|
|
|
|
|
Dijkstra, EWD (1970)
Notes on Structured Programming
, EUT report. WSK, Dept. of Mathematics and Computing Science, 70(3), pp. 1-84
|
|
|
|
|
Neijur, AN and Seinfeld, KS (2016)
Ivy: Bringing a Weighted-Mesh Representation to Bear on Generative Architectural Design Applications
, Posthuman Frontiers: Data, Designers, and Cognitive Machines, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), Ann Arbor, pp. 140-151
|
|
|
|
|
Stefanescu, DS (2020)
Alternate Means of Digital Design Communication
, Ph.D. Thesis, UCL
|
|
|
|
|
Van Der Heijden, RVDH, Levelle, EL and Reise, MR (2015)
Parametric Building Information Generation for Design and Construction
, Proceedings of ACADIA 2015, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, pp. 417-430
|
|
|
|
|
Wasserman, SW and Faust, KF (1994)
Social network analysis: Methods and applications
, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 08:00 |
|
