CumInCAD is a Cumulative Index about publications in Computer Aided Architectural Design
supported by the sibling associations ACADIA, CAADRIA, eCAADe, SIGraDi, ASCAAD and CAAD futures

PDF papers
References
id caadria2020_093
authors Cerovsek, Tomo and Martens, Bob
year 2020
title The Evolution of CAADRIA Conferences - A Bibliometric Approach
doi https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2020.1.325
source D. Holzer, W. Nakapan, A. Globa, I. Koh (eds.), RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans - Proceedings of the 25th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 1, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5-6 August 2020, pp. 325-334
summary This paper presents an analysis of the output, impact, use and content of 1,860 papers that were published in the CAADRIA conference proceedings over the last 20+ years (from 1996 to 2019). The applied methodology is a blend of bibliometrics, webometrics and clustering with text mining. The bibliometric analysis leads to quantitative and qualitative results on three levels: (1) author, (2) article and (3) association. The most productive authors authored over 50 papers, and the top 20% authors have over 80 % of all citations generated by CAADRIA proceedings. The overall impact of CAADRIA may be characterised by nearly 2,000 known citations and by the h-index that is 17. The webometrics based on CumInCAD.org reveals that the CAADRIA papers served over 200 k users, which is a considerable visibility for scientific CAAD output. The keywords most frequently used by authors were digital fabrication, BIM and parametric, generative, computational design. Notably, 90% of the papers' descriptors are 2-grams. This study may be useful to researchers, educators and publishers interested in CAAD.
keywords bibliometrics; open source; text clustering; n-gram
series CAADRIA
email b.martens@tuwien.ac.at
full text file.pdf (3,237,860 bytes)
references Content-type: text/plain
Details Citation Select
100%; open Bornmann, L, Mutz, R and Daniel, HD (2008) Find in CUMINCAD Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), p. 830-837

100%; open Braun, T, Glänzel, W and Schubert, A (2006) Find in CUMINCAD A Hirsch-type index for journals , Scientometrics, 69(1), p. 169-173

100%; open Cerovšek, T and Mikoš, M (2014) Find in CUMINCAD A comparative study of cross-domain research output and citations: Research impact cubes and binary citation frequencies , Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), pp. 147-161

100%; open Costas, R and Bordons, M (2007) Find in CUMINCAD Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level , Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), p. 193-203

100%; open Hirsch, JE (2005) Find in CUMINCAD An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, p. 16569-16572

100%; open Jacsó, P (2009) Find in CUMINCAD The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus , Online Information Review, 33(4), p. 831-837

100%; open Prathap, G (2006) Find in CUMINCAD Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions' scientific research output , Current Science, 91, p. 1439-1440

100%; open Saad, G (2006) Find in CUMINCAD Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively , Scientometrics, 69, pp. 117-120

100%; open Van Raan, AFJ, Van Leeuwen, TN, Visser, MS, Van Eck, NJ and Waltman, L (2010) Find in CUMINCAD Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff , Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), p. 431-435

last changed 2022/06/07 07:55
pick and add to favorite papersHOMELOGIN (you are user _anon_132904 from group guest) CUMINCAD Papers Powered by SciX Open Publishing Services 1.002