| id |
caadria2020_093 |
| authors |
Cerovsek, Tomo and Martens, Bob |
| year |
2020 |
| title |
The Evolution of CAADRIA Conferences - A Bibliometric Approach |
| source |
D. Holzer, W. Nakapan, A. Globa, I. Koh (eds.), RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans - Proceedings of the 25th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 1, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5-6 August 2020, pp. 325-334 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2020.1.325
|
| summary |
This paper presents an analysis of the output, impact, use and content of 1,860 papers that were published in the CAADRIA conference proceedings over the last 20+ years (from 1996 to 2019). The applied methodology is a blend of bibliometrics, webometrics and clustering with text mining. The bibliometric analysis leads to quantitative and qualitative results on three levels: (1) author, (2) article and (3) association. The most productive authors authored over 50 papers, and the top 20% authors have over 80 % of all citations generated by CAADRIA proceedings. The overall impact of CAADRIA may be characterised by nearly 2,000 known citations and by the h-index that is 17. The webometrics based on CumInCAD.org reveals that the CAADRIA papers served over 200 k users, which is a considerable visibility for scientific CAAD output. The keywords most frequently used by authors were digital fabrication, BIM and parametric, generative, computational design. Notably, 90% of the papers' descriptors are 2-grams. This study may be useful to researchers, educators and publishers interested in CAAD. |
| keywords |
bibliometrics; open source; text clustering; n-gram |
| series |
CAADRIA |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (3,237,860 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Bornmann, L, Mutz, R and Daniel, HD (2008)
 Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine
, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), p. 830-837
|
|
|
|
|
Braun, T, Glänzel, W and Schubert, A (2006)
A Hirsch-type index for journals
, Scientometrics, 69(1), p. 169-173
|
|
|
|
|
Cerovšek, T and Mikoš, M (2014)
A comparative study of cross-domain research output and citations: Research impact cubes and binary citation frequencies
, Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), pp. 147-161
|
|
|
|
|
Costas, R and Bordons, M (2007)
Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level
, Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), p. 193-203
|
|
|
|
|
Hirsch, JE (2005)
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, p. 16569-16572
|
|
|
|
|
Jacsó, P (2009)
The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus
, Online Information Review, 33(4), p. 831-837
|
|
|
|
|
Prathap, G (2006)
Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions' scientific research output
, Current Science, 91, p. 1439-1440
|
|
|
|
|
Saad, G (2006)
Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively
, Scientometrics, 69, pp. 117-120
|
|
|
|
|
Van Raan, AFJ, Van Leeuwen, TN, Visser, MS, Van Eck, NJ and Waltman, L (2010)
Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff
, Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), p. 431-435
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:55 |
|
