id |
caadria2020_180 |
authors |
Jensen, Mads Brath and Das, Avishek |
year |
2020 |
title |
Technologies and Techniques for Collaborative Robotics in Architecture - - establishing a framework for human-robotic design exploration |
source |
D. Holzer, W. Nakapan, A. Globa, I. Koh (eds.), RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans - Proceedings of the 25th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 2, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5-6 August 2020, pp. 293-302 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2020.2.293
|
summary |
This study investigates the technological and methodological challenges in establishing an indeterministic approach to robotic fabrication that allows for a collaborative and creative design/fabrication process. The research objective enquires into how robotic processes in architecture can move from deterministic fabrication processes towards explorative and indeterministic design processes. To address this research objective, the study specifically explores how an architect and a robot can engage in a process of co-creation and co-evolution, that is enabled by a collaborative robotic arm equipped with an electric gripper and a web camera. Through a case-based experiment, of designing and constructing an adjustable façade system consisting of parallel wood lamellas, designer and robotic system co-create by means of interactive processes. The study will present and discuss the technological implementations used to construct the interactive robotic-based design process, with emphasis on the integration of visual analysis features in Grasshopper and on the benefits of establishing a state machine for interactive and creative robotic control in architecture. |
keywords |
Design cognition; Digital fabrication ; Construction; Human-computer interaction |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (19,628,619 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Daas, M and Wit, AJ (2018)
Introduction
, Dass, M and Wit, AJ (eds), Towards a Robotic Architecture, Applied Research and Design Publishing, Novato, CA, pp. 8-11
|
|
|
|
Dorst, K and Cross, N (2001)
Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution
, Design Studies, 22(5), pp. 425-437
|
|
|
|
Dubor, A, Camprodom, G, Diaz, GB, Reinhardt, D, Saunders, R, Dunn, K, Niemelä, M, Horlyck, S, Alarcon-Licona, S, Wozniak-O'Connor, D and Watt, R (2016)
Sensors and Workflow Evolutions: Developing a Framework for Instant Robotic Toolpath Revision
, Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2016, Cham, pp. 410-425
|
|
|
|
Garrido-Jurado, S, Mu\~noz-Salinas, R, Madrid-Cuevas, F and Mar\'in-Jim\'enez, M (2014)
Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion
, Pattern Recognition, 47(6), pp. 2280-2292
|
|
|
|
Hauberg, J (2011)
Research by design: a research strategy
, Architecture & Education Journal, 1(2), pp. 1-11
|
|
|
|
Johns, RL, Kilian, A and Foley, N (2014)
Design Approaches Through Augmented Materiality and Embodied Computation
, Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2014, Cham, pp. 319-332
|
|
|
|
Lawson, B (2005)
How Designers Think - The Design Process Demystified
, Taylor & Francis
|
|
|
|
Maher, ML (1994)
Creative design using a genetic algorithm
, Computing in Civil Engineering, Nwe York, pp. 2014-2021
|
|
|
|
Moorman, A, Sabin, JE and Liu, J (2016)
RoboSense: Context-Dependent Robotic Design Protocols and Tools
, ACADIA 2016 Posthuman frontiers, pp. 174-183
|
|
|
|
Pigram, D, Maxwell, I and Mcgee, W (2016)
Towards Real-Time Adaptive Fabrication-Aware Form Finding in Architecture
, Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2016, 1, pp. 427-437
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:52 |
|