id |
caadria2020_436 |
authors |
Teng, Teng and Sabin, Jenny |
year |
2020 |
title |
PICA - A Designer Oriented Low-Cost Personal Robotic Fabrication Platform for Sketch Level Prototyping |
source |
D. Holzer, W. Nakapan, A. Globa, I. Koh (eds.), RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans - Proceedings of the 25th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 2, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5-6 August 2020, pp. 473-483 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2020.2.473
|
summary |
As digital design and fabrication are becoming increasingly prevalent, it is essential to consider how these technologies can be made more affordable and intuitively introduced to individual designers with limited computing skills. In this paper, we present an affordable personal robotic fabrication platform, PICA, consisting of a 3D printed robotic arm with a set of controller programs. The platform allows designers with limited computational design skills to assemble motors and 3D printed parts easily and to operate it in a code-free environment with direct manipulation through 3D modeling software. With the real-time communication between 3D modeling software and this robotic fabrication platform, PICA also allows designers to efficiently change the topological properties of geometry during the fabrication process. Based on a comparative observation of several application scenarios of using PICA among two groups of architecture students, the research can be summarized as follows: 1.) The project has proved to be an affordable approach to ease the materializing process when converting a designer's initial intent from digital space to a physical prototype. 2.) Designers could be facilitated by utilizing this robotic fabrication platform, especially during the period of conceptual design. |
keywords |
Robotic Fabrication; Design and Fabrication; Tool Development; Designer Oriented ; Ubiquitous Manufacturing |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (6,953,683 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Arayici, Y (2011)
Technology adoption in the BIM implementation for lean architectural practice
, Automation in Construction, 20(2), pp. 189-195
|
|
|
|
Bilotti, J (2018)
Robosense 2.0. Robotic sensing and architectural ceramic fabrication
, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 276-285
|
|
|
|
Edgar, B.L (2008)
A Short Biography of KR150 L110
, Gramazio, F (eds), Digital Materiality in Architecture, Lars Müller Publishers
|
|
|
|
Meng, J. C. S. (2009)
Donald Schön, Herbert Simon and the sciences of the artificial
, Design Studies, 30(1), pp. 60-68.
|
|
|
|
Mueller, S (2019)
FormFab: Continuous Interactive Fabrication
, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 315-323
|
|
|
|
Peng, H (2018)
RoMA: Interactive fabrication with augmented reality and a robotic 3D printer
, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 579
|
|
|
|
Rosenwasser, D (2017)
Clay Non-Wovens: Robotic Fabrication and Digital Ceramics
, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 502- 511
|
|
|
|
Sharma, A (2011)
MozArt: a multimodal interface for conceptual 3D modeling
, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces, pp. 307-310
|
|
|
|
Simon, H (1996)
The Sciences of the Artificial
, MIT Press, Cambridge
|
|
|
|
Teng, T (2014)
Inspire: Integrated spatial gesture-based direct 3D modeling and display
, Proceeding of 34th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 445-452
|
|
|
|
Terry, K (2015)
Computational Making
, Design Studies, 41, pp. 1-7
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:58 |
|