| id |
caadria2021_036 |
| authors |
Batchelor, David and Schnabel, Marc Aurel |
| year |
2021 |
| title |
Opportunities and Recommendations for Local Governments Delivering Smart Heritage |
| source |
A. Globa, J. van Ameijde, A. Fingrut, N. Kim, T.T.S. Lo (eds.), PROJECTIONS - Proceedings of the 26th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 2, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Online, Hong Kong, 29 March - 1 April 2021, pp. 749-758 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2021.2.749
|
| summary |
The expansion of smart computer-led technologies into new disciplines enables local governments to design and manage their cities with novel smart discourses. Smart Heritage, the convergence of the smart city and heritage disciplines, offers local governments means to regulate and steer these issues. However, due to its novelty, currently, no research exists on the opportunities and trajectory of Smart Heritage within local government. Therefore, the here presented paper reports the opportunities and recommendations for Smart Heritage within local government, drawing on interviews with smart city and heritage advisors from three Australian local councils. It finds opportunities for smart computer-led technologies to design unique economic, place-making, and governance experiences in cities and recommendations that normalise the delivery of local governments regulatory duties by these technologies. The findings are significant for leading smart technologies further into the practical-political framework of local government and diversifying smart cities scope while at the same time combining two separated policies. |
| keywords |
Smart Heritage; Heritage; Smart City |
| series |
CAADRIA |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (122,294 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Batchelor, D and Schnabel, MA (2019)
 Smart Heritage in selected Australian Local Government Smart City Policies
, Revisiting the Role of Architecture for 'Surviving' Development, (53rd International Conference of the Architectural Science Association (ANZAScA)), Roorkee, p. 245-254
|
|
|
|
|
Batchelor, D and Schnabel, MA (2020)
Interdisciplinary Relationships, Influence, and Aspirations for Smart Heritage in Local Government
, Heritage, 3(1), pp. 1402-1415
|
|
|
|
|
Boogaard, L (2018)
I AmSMARTerdam: Revaluating the Smart City Concept through the World's Most Bottom-up Smart City
, Master's Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Boone, C and Hendriks, W (2009)
Top management team diversity and firm performance: moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity
, Management Science, 55, p. 165-180
|
|
|
|
|
Brusaporci, S (2020)
Towards Smart Heritage: Cultural Challenges in Digital Built Heritage
, Pavlidis, G (eds), Applying Innovative Technologies in Heritage Science, IGI Global, Hershey, p. 271-296
|
|
|
|
|
Clark, P, Staunton, N and Rogers, E (1993)
Innovation in Technology and Organization
, Routledge, London
|
|
|
|
|
Govada, D (2020)
Smart and sustainable city framework with smart cultural precinct as case study
, Urbanie & Urbanus, 3, pp. 22-36
|
|
|
|
|
Helga, N (2017)
Introduction: Investigation Interdisciplinarities
, Frickel, S, Mathieu, A and Prainsack, B (eds), Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Theory and Practice across Disciplines, Rutgers University Press, London, p. 5-24
|
|
|
|
|
Joss, S, Sengers, F, Schraven, D, Caprotti, F and Dayot, Y (2019)
The smart city as global discourse: storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities
, Journal of Urban Technology, 26(1), pp. 3-34
|
|
|
|
|
Lanterman, LJ and Blithe, SJ (2019)
The benefits, challenges, and disincentives of interdisciplinary collaboration
, Commoning Ethnography, 2, p. 149-165
|
|
|
|
|
Lara, AP, Da Costa, EM, Furlani, TZ and Yigitcanlar, T (2016)
Smartness that matters: Towards a comprehensive and human-centred characterisation of smart cities
, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2, p. 8-13.
|
|
|
|
|
Lauring, J and Selmer, J (2012)
Knowledge sharing in diverse organisations
, Human Resource Management Journal, 22, pp. 89-105
|
|
|
|
|
Leeuw, FL, Rist, RC and Sonnichsen, RC (1994)
Can governments learn?: comparative perspectives on evaluation and organisational learning
, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
|
|
|
|
|
Neirotti, P, De Marco, A, Cagliano, A, Mangano, G and Scorrano, F (2014)
Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts
, Cities, 28, pp. 25-36
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaka, I and Nonaka, H (1995)
The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
|
|
|
|
Rushton, H and Schnabel, MA (2021)
Immersive Architectural Legacies: The Construction of Meaning in Virtual Realities
, Ch, E, Gaffney, V and Chapman, H (eds), Visual Heritage in the Digital Age. Springer Series on Cultural Computing, Springer, London, p. pgs. 28
|
|
|
|
|
Smith, L and Waterton, E (2009)
The envy of the world? intangible heritage in England
, Smith, L and Akagawa, N (eds), Intangible Heritage, Routledge, London, pp. 289-302
|
|
|
|
|
Smith, S (2020)
Smart infrastructure for future urban mobility
, AI Magazine, 41(1), pp. 5-15
|
|
|
|
|
Sousa, MJ and González-Loureiro, M (2015)
Knowledge vision on formalisation versus tacitness of sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
, Independent Journal of Management & Production, 6, p. 182-202
|
|
|
|
|
Swan, J, Scarbrough, H and Roberton, M (2002)
The construction of communities of practice in the management of innovation
, Management of Innovation, 33, p. 477-496
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:54 |
|
