id |
caadria2021_044 |
authors |
Wu, Shaoji |
year |
2021 |
title |
3D Space Resilience Analysis of Commercial Complex - Beijing APM as an Example |
source |
A. Globa, J. van Ameijde, A. Fingrut, N. Kim, T.T.S. Lo (eds.), PROJECTIONS - Proceedings of the 26th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 2, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Online, Hong Kong, 29 March - 1 April 2021, pp. 457-466 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2021.2.457
|
summary |
Commercial complexes have played an increasingly important role in contemporary cities. Due to the occurrence of crowded people or equipment overhauls, some paths in a commercial complex may become impassable, which can be seen as disruptions to its spatial system. This paper provides a practical method to quantify the spatial resilience of a commercial complex taking Beijing APM as an example. This study can be divided into the following three steps. First, transforming the realistic spatial path system to a directed network model. Second, using topological, metric, and angular distance as edge weight to calculate the centrality and present its distribution. Third, using two disruption processes, randomized and attractor-guided strategy, evaluates the spatial networks resilience. There are three conclusions from this study. The first one is the process of disruption is non-linear, and there is a phase transition process when it reaches the critical threshold. The second one is the most efficient disruption method is the topological BC attractor-guided strategy. The last one is the resilience of a commercial complex, whose 3D spatial networks resilience is lower than the 2D spatial networks resilience by comparison with Duan and Lus (2013) study. |
keywords |
Resilience; Robustness; Network Secience; Commercial Complex |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (7,350,877 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Albert, R., Albert, I. and Nakarado, G.L. (2004)
Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid
, Physical review E, 69(2), p. 025103
|
|
|
|
Albert, R., Jeong, H. and Barabási, A.L. (2000)
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
, Nature, 406, pp. 378-382
|
|
|
|
Angeloudis, P. and Fisk, D. (2006)
Large subway systems as complex networks
, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 367, pp. 553-558
|
|
|
|
Barabási, A.L. (2016)
Network science
, Cambridge university press
|
|
|
|
Bavelas, A. (1950)
Communication patterns in task?oriented groups
, The journal of the acoustical society of America, 22(6), pp. 725-730
|
|
|
|
Casali, Y. and Heinimann, H.R. (2020)
Robustness response of the Zurich road network under different disruption processes
, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 81, p. 101460
|
|
|
|
Duan, Y. and Lu, F. (2013)
Structural robustness of city road networks based on community.
, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, pp. 75-87
|
|
|
|
Freeman, L.C. (1977)
A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness
, Sociometry, 1977(01), pp. 35-41
|
|
|
|
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1989)
The social logic of space
, Cambridge university press
|
|
|
|
Kermanshah, A. and Derrible, S. (2017)
Robustness of road systems to extreme flooding: using elements of GIS, travel demand, and network science
, Natural Hazards, 86(1), pp. 151-164
|
|
|
|
Philips, R., Troup, L. and Fannon, D. (2017)
Do resilient and sustainable design strategies conflict in commercial buildings? A critical analysis of existing resilient building frameworks and their sustainability implications
, Energy and Buildings, 146, pp. 295-311
|
|
|
|
Yazdani, A. and Jeffrey, P. (2011)
Complex network analysis of water distribution systems.
, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 21(1), p. 016111
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:57 |
|