id |
caadria2022_153 |
authors |
Cheng, Cesar, Li, Yuke, Deshpande, Rutvik, Antonio, Rishan, Chavan, Tejas, Nisztuk, Maciej, Subramanian, Ramanathan, Weijenberg, Camiel and Patel, Sayjel Vijay |
year |
2022 |
title |
Realtime Urban Insights for Bottom-up 15-minute City Design |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2022.1.435
|
source |
Jeroen van Ameijde, Nicole Gardner, Kyung Hoon Hyun, Dan Luo, Urvi Sheth (eds.), POST-CARBON - Proceedings of the 27th CAADRIA Conference, Sydney, 9-15 April 2022, pp. 435-444 |
summary |
This paper introduces a real-time neighbour scoring system, using data collected from various web-based APIs, to facilitate "15-minute city‚ designs. The system extends on the current state of the art in three ways; first, it incorporates a multi-source urban API, to automate the extraction of location-based information from online sources; second, it provides a quantitative method to calculate and index "15-minute city‚ performance; and third, it provides a web-based application, to allow real-time feedback of neighbourhood design performance complementing the design refinements at a building and tenancy level. In addition to discussing its theoretical basis, and technical implementation, this paper provides a case study to demonstrate how the neighbourhood scoring system is incorporated into the design of a hypothetical mixed-use urban development. |
keywords |
Industry Innovation and Infrastructure, Sustainable Cities and Communities, Urban Walkability, Urban Accessibility, 15-minute City, Spatial Analysis, SDG 9, SDG 11 |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (910,206 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Balletto, G., Ladu, M., Milesi, A. & Borruso, G. (2021)
A methodological approach on disused public properties in the 15-minute city perspective
, Sustainability, 13(2), 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020593
|
|
|
|
Blečić, I., Congiu, T., Fancello, G. & Trunfio, G. A. (2020)
Planning and design support tools for walkability: A guide for urban analysts
, Sustainability, 12(11), 4405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114405
|
|
|
|
Boeing, G. (2017)
OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks
, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004Chestnut, J. (2018, March 28). Pedestrians first: Tools for a Walkable City. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. Retrieved February 3, 2022, from https://www.itdp.org/publication/walkability-tool/
|
|
|
|
Fleischmann, M. (2019)
Momepy: Urban morphology measuring toolkit
, Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1807. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01807
|
|
|
|
Karimi, K. (2012)
A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology
, URBAN DESIGN International, 17(4), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19
|
|
|
|
Mehaffy, M. W., Porta, S. & Romice, O. (2015)
The “neighborhood unit” on trial: A case study in the impacts of urban morphology
, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.908786
|
|
|
|
Pozoukidou, G. & Chatziyiannaki, Z. (2021)
15-minute city: Decomposing the new urban planning eutopia
, Sustainability, 13(2), 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020928Quercia, D., Aiello, L. M., Schifanella, R., & Davies, A. (2015). The digital life of walkable streets. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 875–884). https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741631
|
|
|
|
Sevtsuk, A. & Mekonnen, M. (2012)
Urban network analysis toolbox
, International Journal of Geomatics and Spatial Analysis, 22(2), 287–305
|
|
|
|
White, M., Kimm, G. & Langenheim, N. (2017)
Pedestrian access modelling with tree shade – won’t someone think of the children
, Procedia Engineering, 198, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.078
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/07/22 07:34 |
|