id |
caadria2022_205 |
authors |
Bielski, Jessica, Langenhan, Christoph, Ziegler, Christoph, Eisenstadt, Viktor, Dengel, Andreas and Althoff, Klaus-Dieter |
year |
2022 |
title |
Quantifying the Intangible, A Tool for Retrospective Protocol Studies of Sketching During the Early Conceptual Design of Architecture |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2022.1.403
|
source |
Jeroen van Ameijde, Nicole Gardner, Kyung Hoon Hyun, Dan Luo, Urvi Sheth (eds.), POST-CARBON - Proceedings of the 27th CAADRIA Conference, Sydney, 9-15 April 2022, pp. 403-411 |
summary |
Sketching is a craft supporting the development of ideas and design intentions, as well as an effective tool for communication during the early architectural design stages by making them tangible. Even though sketch-based interaction is a promising approach for Computer-Aided Architectural Design (CAAD) systems, it remains a challenge for computers to recognise information in a sketch. Design protocol studies conducted to deconstruct the sketch and sketching process collect solely qualitative data so far. However, the 'metis' projects aim to create an intelligent design assistant, using an artificial neural network (ANN), in the manner of Negroponte‚s Architecture Machine. By assimilating to the user's idiosyncrasies, the system suggests further design steps to the architect to improve the design decision making process for economic growth, qualitative self-education through the dialogue and reducing stress. For training such ANN quantitative data is needed. In order to produce quantifiable results from such a study, we propose our open-source web-tool ‚Sketch Protocol Analyser‚. By correlating different parameters (i.e. video, transcript and sketch built) through the same labels and their timestamps, we create quantitative data for further use. |
keywords |
Design Protocol Studies, Sketching, Data Collection, Architectural Design Process, ANN, SDG 3, SDG 4, SDG 8, SDG 9 |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (864,391 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Buxton, B. (2010)
Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design
, Morgan Kaufmann
|
|
|
|
Goel, V. (1995)
Sketches of thought
, MIT Press
|
|
|
|
Goldschmidt, G. (1994)
On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture
, Design Studies, 15(2), 158–174
|
|
|
|
Johnson, G., Gross, M. D., Hong, J. & Do, E. Y.-L. (2009)
Computational support for sketching in design: a review
, Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 1–93
|
|
|
|
Laseau, P. (2000)
Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers
, Wiley, USA
|
|
|
|
Lawson, B. (2004)
What Designers know, 1st edition
, Elsevier, Oxford
|
|
|
|
Lawson, B. (2005)
How Designers Think, 4th edition
, Elsevier, Oxford
|
|
|
|
Leclercq, P. & Juchmes, R. (2002)
The absent interface in design engineering
, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. AI EDAM, 16(3), 219–227
|
|
|
|
Negroponte, N. (1973)
The architecture machine: Toward a more human environment
, The MIT Press
|
|
|
|
Richter, K. (2019)
Augmenting Designers' Memory: Case Based Reasoning in der Architektur
, (Doctoral Dissertation, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar)
|
|
|
|
Schön, D., and Wiggins, G. (1992)
Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing
, Design Studies, 13(2), 135–156
|
|
|
|
Sutherland, I. E. (1964)
Sketchpad a man-machine graphical communication system
, Simulation, 2(5), 329-346
|
|
|
|
Suwa, M and Tversky, B (1997)
What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis
, Design Studies, 18, 385-403
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/07/22 07:34 |
|