id |
caadria2022_472 |
authors |
Perry, Gabriella and Garcia del Castillo y Lopez, Jose Luis |
year |
2022 |
title |
Droop ‚ An Iterative Design Tool for Material Draping |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2022.2.283
|
source |
Jeroen van Ameijde, Nicole Gardner, Kyung Hoon Hyun, Dan Luo, Urvi Sheth (eds.), POST-CARBON - Proceedings of the 27th CAADRIA Conference, Sydney, 9-15 April 2022, pp. 283-292 |
summary |
Advances in large-scale 3D printing technology have opened up explorations on novel non-solid, non-layered 3D printing techniques such as spatial lattices and material draping. These new printing techniques have potential to reduce the wasted material from printing support structures and optimize overall material use. However, due to the inherent material unpredictability of many of these systems, they are often difficult to approximate with digital tools, often requiring simple trial and error to achieve a specific result, with the consequent waste of time and resources. Droop is a work in progress material-informed simulation environment that serves as an iterative design tool for material draping fabrication processes. Droop explores the material potential of thermoplastics through the fabrication process of robotic draping to achieve complex linked catenary forms. This bespoke simulation environment approximates the spatial form of a material draping process and serves as a useful iterative design tool that allows designers to better understand and predict how a 2D pattern translates into a 3D droop form. The simulation also reduces the amount of wasted material produced by trial-and-error material draping processes. In this paper, we present the digital simulation framework, discuss methods for material-informed calibration, and show a set of experiments produced with this tool. |
keywords |
Material Draping, Physics Simulation, Additive Manufacturing, Robotic Fabrication, Catenary Geometry, SDG 12 |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (1,389,572 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Bilotti, J., Norman, B., Rosenwasser, D., Leo Liu, J. & Sabin, J. (2018)
Robosense 2
, Robotic sensing and architectural ceramic fabrication. ACADIA Recalibration. On imprecision and infidelity 2018 (pp. 276-285)
|
|
|
|
Burry, M. (2016)
Antoni Gaudi and Frei Otto: Essential precursors to the parametricism manifesto
, Architectural Design, 86(2), 30-35
|
|
|
|
Chen, Z., Zhang, L. & Yuan, P. F. (2019)
Innovative design approach to optimized performance on large-scale robotic 3D-printed spatial structure
, Proceedings of the 24th CAADRIA Conference 2019 (pp. 451-460)
|
|
|
|
Claire Im, H., AlOthman, S. & García del Castillo y Lopez, J. L. (2018)
Responsive Spatial Print
, Clay 3D printing of spatial lattices using real-time model recalibration. ACADIA Recalibration. On imprecision and infidelity 2018 (pp. 286-293)
|
|
|
|
Makert, R. & Alves, G. (2016)
Between designer and design: Parametric design and prototyping considerations on Gaudí’s Sagrada Familia
, Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 47(2), 89-93
|
|
|
|
Rosenwasser, D., Mantell, S. & Sabin, J. (2017)
Clay non-wovens: robotic fabrication and digital ceramics
, ACADIA: Disciplines & Disruption 2017 (pp. 502- 511)
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/07/22 07:34 |
|