id |
caadria2023_412 |
authors |
Li, Yuanyuan, Huang, Chenyu and Yao, Jiawei |
year |
2023 |
title |
Optimising the Control Strategies for Performance-Driven Dynamic Building Facades Using Machine Learning |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2023.1.199
|
source |
Immanuel Koh, Dagmar Reinhardt, Mohammed Makki, Mona Khakhar, Nic Bao (eds.), HUMAN-CENTRIC - Proceedings of the 28th CAADRIA Conference, Ahmedabad, 18-24 March 2023, pp. 199–208 |
summary |
The balance between energy consumption and indoor environmental comfort is a continuing research topic in building energy efficiency. The dynamic façades (DF) are considered a practical approach to separate the sun and create more shadows for buildings with curtain walls, reducing the HVAC system's energy consumption. However, the design complexity of the DF leads to a time-consuming simulation process, making it difficult to modify the design parameters in the early design stage efficiently. This paper provides optimized control strategies for four dynamic façade prototypes. We use explainable machine learning to explore the relationship between design parameters of DF and indoor performance, including Energy Use Intensity (EUI) and Daylight Glare Probability (DGP). We deployed the trained model in optimizing the rotation angle of DF per hour on a typical day to minimize the EUI and DGP of the target room. The results show that the rotation angle of DF significantly affects the DGP, whereas the room size affects EUI performance more than rotation angles. Optimized control strategies of DF bring a maxim 13.5% EUI decrease and 51.7% reduction of DGP. Our work provides a generalizable design flow for performance-driven dynamic skin design. |
keywords |
Dynamic façade, Energy consumption, Indoor comfort, computational simulation, Multi-objective optimization, Machine learning |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (10,783,986 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Ascione, F., Bianco, N., De Masi, R. F., Mauro, G. M., & Vanoli, G. P. (2017)
Energy Retrofit of Educational Buildings: Transient Energy Simulations, Model Calibration and Multi-objective Optimization Towards Nearly Zero-energy Performance
, Energy and Buildings, 144, 33-319. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.enbuild.217.3.56
|
|
|
|
Böke, J., Knaack, U., & Hemmerling, M. (2019)
State-of-the-art of Intelligent Building Envelopes in the Context of Intelligent Technical Systems
, Intelligent Buildings International,11:1,27-45. Available at: https://doi.org/1.18/1758975.218.1447437
|
|
|
|
Evins, R. (2013)
A Review of Computational Optimisation Methods Applied to Sustainable Building Design
, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 22, pp. 23-245). Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.rser.213.2.4
|
|
|
|
Favoino, F., Baracani, M., Giovannini, L., Gennaro, G., & Goia, F. (2022)
Embedding Intelligence to Control Adaptive Building Envelopes
, Rethinking Building Skins, 155-179. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/B978--12-822477-9.7-
|
|
|
|
González, J., & Fiorito, F. (2015)
Daylight Design of Office Buildings: Optimisation of External Solar Shadings By Using Combined Simulation Methods
, Buildings, 5(2), 56-58. Available at: https://doi.org/1.339/buildings5256
|
|
|
|
Han, Y., Shen, L., & Sun, C. (2021)
Developing a Parametric Morphable Annual Daylight Prediction Model with Improved Generalization Capability for the Early Stages of Office Building Design
, Building and Environment, 2(March), 17932. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.buildenv.221.17932
|
|
|
|
Kim, H., & Clayton, M. J. (2020)
A Multi-objective Optimization Approach for Climate-adaptive Building Envelope Design Using Parametric Behavior Maps
, Building and Environment, 185. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.buildenv.22.17292
|
|
|
|
Loonen, R. C. G. M., Trèka, M., Cóstola, D., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2013)
Climate Adaptive Building Shells: State-of-the-art and Future Challenges
, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 483-493. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.rser.213.4.16
|
|
|
|
Luna-Navarro, A., Loonen, R., Juaristi, M., Monge-Barrio, A., Attia, S., & Overend, M. (2020)
Occupant-facade Interaction: a Review and Classification Scheme
, Building and Environment, 177(March), 1688. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.buildenv.22.1688
|
|
|
|
Nguyen, A. T., Reiter, S., & Rigo, P. (2014)
A Review on Simulation-based Optimization Methods Applied to Building Performance Analysis
, Applied Energy (Vol. 113, pp. 143-158). Elsevier Ltd. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.apenergy.213.8.61
|
|
|
|
Romano, R., Aelenei, L., Aelenei, D., & Mazzucchelli, E. S. (2018)
What is an Adaptive Façade? Analysis of Recent Terms and Definitions from an International Perspective
, Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 6(3), 65-76. Available at: https://doi.org/1.748/jfde.218.3.2478
|
|
|
|
Roudsari, M.S., & Pak, M. (2013)
Ladybug: a Parametric Environmental Plugin for Grasshopper to Help Designers Create an Environmentally-conscious Design
, Proceedings of BS 213: 13th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, 3128-3135 DOI:1.26868/2522278.213.2499
|
|
|
|
Shi, X., Abel, T., & Wang, L. (2020)
Influence of Two Motion Types on Solar Transmittance and Daylight Performance of Dynamic Faades
, Solar Energy, 21(March), 561-58. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.solener.22.3.17
|
|
|
|
Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., & Tsangrassoulis, A. (2021)
A Review of Occupant-centric Control Strategies for Adaptive Facades
, Automation in Construction, 122(May), 13464. Available at: https://doi.org/1.116/j.autcon.22.13464
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2023/06/15 23:14 |
|