id |
caadria2024_216 |
authors |
Rafizadeh, Hamidreza, Belek Fialho Teixeira, Müge, Donovan, Jared and Schork, Tim |
year |
2024 |
title |
Evolving Architectural Paradigms: A Study of Levels of Automation in Architecture |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2024.3.079
|
source |
Nicole Gardner, Christiane M. Herr, Likai Wang, Hirano Toshiki, Sumbul Ahmad Khan (eds.), ACCELERATED DESIGN - Proceedings of the 29th CAADRIA Conference, Singapore, 20-26 April 2024, Volume 3, pp. 79–88 |
summary |
The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction industry (AEC) is increasingly embracing automation, especially through advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI). This paper proposes Levels of Automation (LOA) for architectural tasks, categorizing them into creative, documentation and planning, and physically demanding tasks. The study outlines LOA for each category, progressing from basic digital assistance to autonomous machine-driven operations in design and construction. Challenges and implications of varied automation levels are discussed, emphasizing dynamic task allocation based on context, available technology, and task complexity. Decision-making processes are examined concerning the suitability of AI and human intervention. Safety, adaptability, and task-specific considerations are highlighted in selecting suitable LOAs. This paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on automation in architecture, emphasizing the collaborative potential of humans and machines. As automation becomes inevitable in the AEC industry, selecting appropriate LOAs promises enhanced productivity, safety, cost-effectiveness, and overall project quality. |
keywords |
Level of Automation, Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI, Adaptive Automation, Architecture |
series |
CAADRIA |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (1,641,851 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Altavilla, S., & Blanco, E. (2020)
Are AI tools going to be the new designers? A taxonomy for measuring the level of automation of design activities
, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 81-90). Cambridge University Press
|
|
|
|
Assaf, S., Hassanain, M.A. and Abdallah, A. (2018)
Review and assessment of the causes of deficiencies in design documents for large construction projects
, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 300 317. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-10-2017-0050
|
|
|
|
Belém, C., dos Santos, L. F., & Leitao, A. (2019)
On the impact of machine learning: architecture without architects?
, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference CAAD Futures 2019: Hello, Culture! (pp274-293)
|
|
|
|
Bock, T. (2015)
The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics
, Automation in Construction, Volume 59, Pages 113-121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
|
|
|
|
Caetano, I., & Leitao, A. (2020)
Architecture meets computation: an overview of the evolution of computational design approaches in architecture
, Architectural Science Review, 63(2), 165-174
|
|
|
|
Chen, X., Chang-Richards, A. Y., Pelosi, A., Jia, Y., Shen, X., Siddiqui, M. K., & Yang, N. (2022)
Implementation of technologies in the construction industry: a systematic review
, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(8), 3181-3209
|
|
|
|
Elliott, D., & Soifer, E. (2022)
AI Technologies, Privacy, and Security [Hypothesis and Theory]
, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5
|
|
|
|
Grobman, Y. J., Yezioro, A., & Capeluto, I. G. (2010)
Non-linear architectural design process
, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 8(1), 41-53
|
|
|
|
Habib, L., Pacaux-Lemoine, M. P., & Millot, P. (2017)
A method for designing levels of automation based on a human-machine cooperation model
, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 1372-1377
|
|
|
|
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018)
Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making
, Business horizons, 61(4), 577-586
|
|
|
|
Karoji, G., Hotta, K., Hotta, A., & Ikeda, Y. (2019)
Pedestrian dynamic behaviour modelling
, 24th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia: Intelligent and Informed, CAADRIA 2019 (pp. 281-290)
|
|
|
|
Manzoor, B., Othman, I., & Pomares, J. C. (2021)
Digital technologies in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry-A bibliometric-Qualitative literature review of research activities
, International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(11), 6135
|
|
|
|
Neubauer, R. (2017)
Mechanisation and automation in concrete production
, Modernisation, mechanisation and industrialisation of concrete structures, 210-300
|
|
|
|
Rafsanjani, H. N., & Nabizadeh, A. H. (2023)
Towards digital architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry through virtual design and construction (VDC) and digital twin
, Energy and Built Environment, 4(2), 169-178
|
|
|
|
Saidi, K. S., Bock, T., & Georgoulas, C. (2016)
Robotics in Construction
, B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Robotics (pp. 1493-1520). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_57
|
|
|
|
Salmi, A., David, P., Blanco, E., & Summers, J. D. (2015)
Deciding the level of automation during the design of assembly systems: literature review of decision methods and a new approach proposal
, International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering (CIE45)
|
|
|
|
Sandberg, M., Gerth, R., Lu, W., Jansson, G., Mukkavaara, J., & Olofsson, T. (2016)
Design automation in construction: An overview
, 33rd CIB W78 Conference 2016, Oct. 31st-Nov. 2nd, 2016, Brisbane, Australia
|
|
|
|
Sönmez, N. O. (2018)
A review of the use of examples for automating architectural design tasks
, Computer-Aided Design, 96, 13-30
|
|
|
|
Turner, C. J., Oyekan, J., Stergioulas, L., & Griffin, D. (2020)
Utilizing industry 4.0 on the construction site: Challenges and opportunities
, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(2), 746-756
|
|
|
|
Vagia, M., Transeth, A. A., & Fjerdingen, S. A. (2016)
A literature review on the levels of automation during the years
, What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed? Applied ergonomics, 53, 190-202
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2024/11/17 22:05 |
|