| id |
ecaade2010_026 |
| authors |
Rafi, Ahmad; Rani, Ruzaimi Mat |
| year |
2010 |
| title |
Visual Perception and Visualization Tools for Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) on Urban Streetscape |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2010.575
|
| source |
FUTURE CITIES [28th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 978-0-9541183-9-6] ETH Zurich (Switzerland) 15-18 September 2010, pp.575-581 |
| summary |
Two different surveys were conducted for visual impact assessment (VIA) on urban streetscape namely – the visual perception and visualization tools. The first was focused on the visual perception between designers and nondesigners of the undergraduate students from four different public universities in Malaysia representing landscape architecture and business administration courses whereas the latter concentrated on students with a background of landscape architecture and quantity surveyor to evaluate static and dynamic visualization tools. The paper discussed the findings of the visual perception and visualization tools surveys, and its impact towards improving VIA on urban streetscape. |
| wos |
WOS:000340629400062 |
| keywords |
Visual perception; Visualization tool; Visual impact assessment; Urban streetscape |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (961,913 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Bishop, ID and Lange, E (2005)
 Visualization classified
, I.D. Bishop and E. Lange (eds), Visualization in landscape and environmental planning: Technology and application, Taylor and Francis, London/New York, pp. 23-34
|
|
|
|
|
Bishop, ID and Lange, E (2005)
Presentation Style and Technology
, I.D. Bishop and E. Lange (eds), Visualization in landscape and environmental planning: Technology and application, Taylor and Francis, London/New York, pp. 68–77
|
|
|
|
|
Bishop, ID and Rohrmann, B (2003)
Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison
, Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, pp. 261–277
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel, TC (2001)
Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in 21st century
, Landscape and Urban Planning, 56, pp. 267–281
|
|
|
|
|
Gordon, IE (2004)
Theories of visual perception, 3rd edition
, Psychology Press, London, UK
|
|
|
|
|
Junker, B and Buchecker, M (2008)
Aesthetic preference versus ecological objectives in river restorations
, Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(3–4), pp.141–154
|
|
|
|
|
Palmer, JF, and Hoffman, RE (2001)
Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessment
, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), pp.149–161
|
|
|
|
|
Sanoff, H (1991)
Visual Research Methods in Design
, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Sheppard, SRJ (1989)
Visual Simulation: A user guide for architects, engineers, and planners
, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA
|
|
|
|
|
The Landscape Institute (2002)
Guidelines for landscape and visual impact assessment , 2nd edition
, Spon Press, London, UK
|
|
|
|
|
Zube, EH, Sell, JL and Taylor, JG (1982)
Landscape perception: research, application, and theory
, Landscape Planning, 9, pp.1–33
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 08:00 |
|
