| id |
ecaade2011_090 |
| authors |
Verovsek, Spela; Juvancic, Matevz; Zupancic, Tadeja |
| year |
2011 |
| title |
Interpretation Model of Urban Space Coherence |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2011.886
|
| source |
RESPECTING FRAGILE PLACES [29th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 978-9-4912070-1-3], University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture (Slovenia) 21-24 September 2011, pp.886-894 |
| summary |
The paper presents our efforts to establish a model for urban space interpretation (IMUSC – Interpretation Model of Urban Spatial Coherence), intended as a pragmatic instrument for recognizing elements and phenomena that affect actual use of urban spaces. The initial premise proposes the mechanism for traceable linkage between the basic, mostly visible elements and features in the urban space, and three qualities concerning actual use: (a) access to the space, (b) movement within and through the space and (c) permitted/ tolerated and stimulated sojourning of the users in the space. The model aims to assist with bridging the communicational gap between expert and lay public occurring in the formal or informal process of spatial co-deciding, by increasing comprehension of spatial complexities and hence developing common priorities concerning spatial values. |
| wos |
WOS:000335665500102 |
| keywords |
Spatial qualities; interpretation model; public participation; urban design |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (1,250,295 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Ewing, R., Handy, S. (2009)
 Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability
, Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), pp. 65 – 84
|
|
|
|
|
Forsyth, A., Jacobson, J., Thering, K. (2010)
Six Assessments of the Same Places: Comparing Views of Urban Design
, Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), pp. 21 – 48
|
|
|
|
|
Franz, G., Heyde, M., Bülthoff, H. (2005)
Predicting experiential qualities of architecture by its spatial properties
, Martens, B and Keul, AG (Eds.), Designing Social Innovation: Planning, Building, Evaluating, Hogrefe and Huber, Cambridge
|
|
|
|
|
Frigg, R., Hartmann, S. (2009)
Models in Science
, Zalta EN (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford CA
|
|
|
|
|
Frumkin, H. (2003)
Healthy places: exploring the evidence
, Am J Public Health, 93(9), pp. 1451–1456
|
|
|
|
|
Gehl, J. (1987)
Life Between Buildings — Using Public Space
, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
|
|
|
|
|
Hudson-Smith, A. (2008)
The visual city
, Dodge, M, McDerby M, Turner M (eds.), Geographic visualization: concepts, tools and applications, Wiley, Chichester
|
|
|
|
|
King, S., Conley, M., Latimer, B., Ferrari, D. (1989)
Co-Design: A Process of Design Participation
, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
|
|
|
|
|
Lynch, K. (1960)
The Image of the City
, MIT Press, Cambridge MA
|
|
|
|
|
Molotch, H. (2011)
Granite and green: thinking beyond surface in place studies
, Theory and Society, 40(2), pp. 155-159
|
|
|
|
|
Polic, M., Marusic, J., Kos, D., Natek, K. (2005)
People-environment studies in Slovenia: past and prospects
, Martens, B. (ed.) Design social innovation: planning, building, evaluating, Hogrefe, Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S. (2010)
Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review
, Preventive Medicine 50(1), pp.106-125
|
|
|
|
|
Rapoport, A. (1970)
The Study of Spatial Quality
, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 4(4), pp. 81-96
|
|
|
|
|
Tuan, Y. (1975)
Place: An experiential Perspective
, Geographical Review, 65(2), pp. 151-165
|
|
|
|
|
Winkela, G., Saegert S., Evans, G.V. (2009)
An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges
, Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(3), pp. 318-328
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/05/01 23:21 |
|
