| id |
ecaade2013_065 |
| authors |
Davila Delgado, Juan Manuel and Hofmeyer, Herm |
| year |
2013 |
| title |
Automated Simulation and Study of Spatial-Structural Design Processes |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2013.2.155
|
| source |
Stouffs, Rudi and Sariyildiz, Sevil (eds.), Computation and Performance – Proceedings of the 31st eCAADe Conference – Volume 2, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 18-20 September 2013, pp. 155-164 |
| wos |
WOS:000340643600015 |
| summary |
A so-called “Design Process Investigation toolbox” (DPI toolbox), has been developed. It is a set of computational tools that simulate spatial-structural design processes. Its objectives are to study spatial-structural design processes and to support the involved actors. Two case-studies are presented which demonstrate how to: (1) study the influence of transformation methods on design instances and (2) study the influence of transformation methods on the behavior of other transformation methods. It was found that in design instances with the same type of structural elements the influence of a specifically varied transformation method is more explicit; while, when different types are present this influence is more undetermined. It was also found that the use of two specifically different structural modification methods have little influence on the sub-sequential spatial transformation method. |
| keywords |
Design process research; design process simulation; spatial design; structural design. |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (3,672,904 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Brooks, FP (2010)
 The Design of Design
, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, MA
|
|
|
|
|
Coates, P (2010)
Programming.Architecture
, Routledge
|
|
|
|
|
Cross, N (2006)
Designerly Ways of Knowing
, Design Issues, 17(3), pp. 49–55
|
|
|
|
|
Cross, N (2008)
Engineering Design Methods 4th ed.
, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
|
|
|
|
|
Davila Delgado, JM and Hofmeyer, H (2013)
Research Engine: A tool to simulate and study spatial-structural design processes
, Proceedings of CAAD Futures 2013, July 3-5, Shanghai, China
|
|
|
|
|
Grobman, YJ, Yezioro, A and Capeluto Guedi, I (2010)
Non-Linear Architectural Design Process
, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 8(1), pp. 41–54
|
|
|
|
|
Haymaker, J, et al. (2004)
Engineering Test Cases to Motivate the Formalization of an AEC Project Model as a Directed Acyclic Graphs of Views and Dependencies
, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 9(January), pp. 419–441
|
|
|
|
|
Hofmeyer, H and Bakker, MCM (2008)
Spatial to kinematically determined structural transformations
, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(3), pp. 393–409
|
|
|
|
|
Hofmeyer, H and Davila Delgado, JM (2013)
Automated design studies: Topology versus One-Step Evolutionary Structural Optimisation
, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Available online 28 April 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Kalay, YE (2004)
Architecture’s New Media: Principles
, Theories and Methods of Computer-Aided Design, MIT Press
|
|
|
|
|
Maher, M L, Poon, J and Boulanger, S (1996)
Formalising Design Exploration as Co-evolution: A Combined Gene Approach
, Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD: Proceedings of the IFIP WG5.2 Workshop on Formal Design Methods for Computer-Aided Design, Springer, pp. 3–30
|
|
|
|
|
Shea, K and Cagan, J (1999)
Languages and semantics of grammatical discrete structures
, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 13(04), pp.241–251
|
|
|
|
|
Shea, K, Aish, R and Gourtovaia, M (2005)
Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools
, Automation in Construction, 14(2), pp. 253–264
|
|
|
|
|
Stiny, G (1980)
Introduction to shape and shape grammars
, Environment and Planning, 7(3), pp.343–351
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:55 |
|
