| id |
ecaade2015_211 |
| authors |
Stellingwerff, Martijn |
| year |
2015 |
| title |
The MOOC-ability of Design Education |
| source |
Martens, B, Wurzer, G, Grasl T, Lorenz, WE and Schaffranek, R (eds.), Real Time - Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference - Volume 2, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 16-18 September 2015, pp. 57-60 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2015.2.057
|
| summary |
In the past three years, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have become an important new way for universities to reach out to possible matriculates, life long learners and alumni. Although MOOCs already cover a vast amount of subjects and curricula, it is remarkable to ascertain the lack of Architectural Design courses on the main platforms like edX and Coursera. Online courses do cover design aspects, e.g. about styles and building materials, but 'design as activity' is an exceptional subject in the portfolio of available MOOCs. In contrast, the CAAD community was one of the first to develop Virtual Design Studio's (VDS) and experimental predecessors of MOOC platforms, such as the AVOCAAD course database system (Af Klercker et al. 2001). Yet, the query 'MOOC' still does not ring a bell in the CUMINCAD publication database (per May 2015). In this paper I will explore a palette of design education settings, in order to find a fit to what a MOOC platform can offer. I will compare the 'MOOC-ability' of Design Education to chances in Virtual Design Studio's and developments in ubiquitous mobile platforms. |
| wos |
WOS:000372316000008 |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| more |
https://mh-engage.ltcc.tuwien.ac.at/engage/ui/watch.html?id=fe4b575c-6e8e-11e5-a43c-c7a045e8393b |
| full text |
 file.pdf (82,310 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Achten, H, Koszewski, K and Martens, B (2011)
 What happened after the "Hype" on Virtual Design Studios?: Some Considerations for a Roundtable Discussion
, 29th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 978-9-4912070-1-3, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture (Slovenia), pp. 23-32
|
|
|
|
|
Af Klercker, J., Achten, H and Verbeke, J (2001)
AVOCAAD - A First Step Towards Distance Learning?
, 19th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9523687-8-1, Helsinki, pp. 269-274
|
|
|
|
|
Bradford, JW, Cheng, N and Kvan, T (1994)
Virtual Design Studios
, Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design / ISBN 0-9523687-0-6, Glasgow, pp. 163-167
|
|
|
|
|
Clow, D (2013)
MOOCs and the funnel of participation
, Third Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven, pp. 185-189
|
|
|
|
|
Ham, JJ and Schnabel, MA (2012)
How social is the virtual design studio? A case study of a third year design studio
, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, Chennai, p. 173-182
|
|
|
|
|
Kvan, T (1997)
Studio Teaching Without Meeting: Pedagogical Aspects of a Virtual Design Studio
, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia / ISBN 957-575-057-8, Taiwan, pp. 163-177
|
|
|
|
|
van Dooren, EJGC (2011)
Making explicit in design education : generic elements in the design process.
, N Roozenburg, LL Chen & PJ Stappers (Eds.), Diversity and unity: Proceedings of IASDR 2011, Delft, pp. 1-12
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:56 |
|
