| id |
ecaade2017_144 |
| authors |
Lange, Christian J. |
| year |
2017 |
| title |
Elements | robotic interventions II |
| source |
Fioravanti, A, Cursi, S, Elahmar, S, Gargaro, S, Loffreda, G, Novembri, G, Trento, A (eds.), ShoCK! - Sharing Computational Knowledge! - Proceedings of the 35th eCAADe Conference - Volume 1, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 20-22 September 2017, pp. 671-678 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2017.1.671
|
| summary |
Reviewing the current research trends in robotic fabrication around the world, the trajectory promises new opportunities for innovation in Architecture and the possible redefinition of the role of the Architect in the industry itself. New entrepreneurial, innovative start-ups are popping up everywhere challenging the traditional model of the architect. However, it also poses new questions and challenges in the education of the architect today. What are the appropriate pedagogical methods to instill enthusiasm for new technologies, materials, and craft? How do we avoid the pure application of pre-set tools, such as the use of the laser cutter has become, which in many schools around the world has caused problems rather than solving problems? How do we teach students to invent their tools especially in a society that doesn't have a strong background in the making? The primary focus of this paper is on how architectural CAAD/ CAM education through the use of robotic fabrication can enhance student's understanding, passion and knowledge of materiality, technology, and craftsmanship. The paper is based on the pedagogical set-up and method of an M. Arch I studio that was taught by the author in fall 2016 with the focus on robotic fabrication, materiality, traditional timber construction systems, tool design and digital and physical craftsmanship. |
| keywords |
CAAD Education, Digital Technology, Craftsmanship, Material Studies, Tool Design, Parametric Modeling, Robotic Fabrication |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (6,209,631 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Brell-Çokcan, S and Braumann, J (2013)
 Industrial Robots for Design Education: Robots as Open Interfaces beyond Fabrication
, Proceedings 15th International Conference of CAAD Futures 2013, Shanghai, China, pp. 109-117
|
|
|
|
|
Budig, M, Lim, J and Petrovic, R (2014)
Integrating Robotic Fabrication in the design Process
, AD, No 229, pp. 22-31
|
|
|
|
|
Daas, M and Wit, A (2015)
Pedagogy of Architectural Robotics - An inconvenient studio for Unsolicited Innovation
, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2015, pp. 3-12
|
|
|
|
|
Feringa, F (2014)
Entrepreneurship in architectural robotics - the simultaneity of craft, economics and design
, AD, No 229, pp. 60-65
|
|
|
|
|
Gramazio, F and Kohler, M (2014)
Authoring Robotic Processes
, AD, No 229, pp. 14-21
|
|
|
|
|
Gramazio, F and Kohler, M (2014)
Thriving Digital Materiality
, Gramazio, F and Kohler, M (eds), The Robotic Touch, Park Books, Zuerich, Switzerland, pp. 15-22
|
|
|
|
|
Koolhaas, R (2016)
Elements
, Marsilio, Milan, Italy
|
|
|
|
|
Lange, CJ and I, Rocker (2013)
Serial Architectures, Systems of Multiplicities and Adaptability
, Proceedings of International Conference on Adaptation and Movement in Architecture, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada, pp. 485-497
|
|
|
|
|
Menges, A and Ahlquist, S (2011)
Computational Design Thinking
, AD Reader John Wiley & Sons, London, UK., -, p. -
|
|
|
|
|
Senagala, M (1999)
An Inconvenient studio
, ACADIA 09: reform ()-Building a better tomorrow, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, p. 287
|
|
|
|
|
Sweet, K (2015)
Robotic Workflow, An Architectural Pedagogical Approach
, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2015, pp. 519-528
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:52 |
|
