id |
ecaade2017_274 |
authors |
Lanham, Thomas, Shaifa, Irvin, Poustinchi, Ebrahim and Luhan, Gregory |
year |
2017 |
title |
Craft and Digital Consequences - Micro-Hybrid Explorations at (Full) Scale |
source |
Fioravanti, A, Cursi, S, Elahmar, S, Gargaro, S, Loffreda, G, Novembri, G, Trento, A (eds.), ShoCK! - Sharing Computational Knowledge! - Proceedings of the 35th eCAADe Conference - Volume 2, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 20-22 September 2017, pp. 327-336 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2017.2.327
|
summary |
This paper presents a comprehensive project-based research investigation that uses both drawing and modeling to challenge conventional design space. Situated at the University of Kentucky-College of Design Applied Computation Center (CoDACC) in Lexington, KY, this independent undergraduate research project reveals an immersive framework that develops, evaluates, and assesses both graphic and three-dimensional information at full scale. This research provides a framework that seamlessly negotiates analog and digital means of communication and prototyping. This paper outlines the micro-hybrid design process to frame topics germane to today's increasingly complex built environment. The paper also includes the micro-hybrid decision-making matrix and discusses the evaluation of the produced artifacts. The research demonstrates how the micro-hybrid process can reveal both the craft and consequences related to design experimentation and construction. Further, the micro-hybrid process has been shown to deepen a student's understanding of the composition of materials and a student's awareness of forces and structural loads, which in turn has produced a deeper appreciation for the principles of structures and an improved mastery of manufacturing jointing details. |
keywords |
Digital; Pedagogy; Fabrication; Experimentation; Simulation |
series |
eCAADe |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (7,088,578 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Bryan, B. and Grosman, H. (2016)
Drawing in time: Processes of design and fabrication
, Architectural Design, 86(1), pp. 98-107
|
|
|
|
Cook, P. (2014)
Drawing: The motive force of architecture
, AD primers, London
|
|
|
|
Lavin, S. (2015)
Man vs. machine: Sylvia Lavin retools creativity
, Los Angeles Forum for Architecture and Urban Design, 1(Retrieved from http://laforum.org/delirious/man-vs-machine-sylvia-lavin-retools-creativity/), pp. 1-2
|
|
|
|
Luhan, G.A. (2016)
Measurement of self-efficacy, predisposition for collaboration, and project scores in architectural design studio
, Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University
|
|
|
|
Lynn, G. (1999)
Animate Form
, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, NY
|
|
|
|
Pallasmaa, J. and Brislin, P. (2012)
Newness, tradition and identity: Existential content and meaning in architecture
, Architectural Design, 82(6), pp. 14-21
|
|
|
|
Pallasmaa, J. and Spens, M. (2007)
New architectural horizons
, Architectural Design, 77(2), pp. 16-23
|
|
|
|
Pallasmaa, J. (2005)
The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses
, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
|
|
|
|
Spiller, N. (2013)
Architectural drawing: Grasping for the fifth dimension
, Architectural Design, 83(5), pp. 14-19
|
|
|
|
Wiscombe, T. (2016)
Tom Wiscombe interviewed by Zachary Tate Porter
, Offramp, 11(Retrieved from http://sciarc-offramp.info/ground/interview-with-zachary-tate-porter), pp. 2-7
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:52 |
|