id |
ecaade2018_377 |
authors |
Beaudry Marchand, Emmanuel, Dorta, Tomás and Pierini, Davide |
year |
2018 |
title |
Influence of Immersive Contextual Environments on Collaborative Ideation Cognition - Through design conversations, gestures and sketches |
source |
Kepczynska-Walczak, A, Bialkowski, S (eds.), Computing for a better tomorrow - Proceedings of the 36th eCAADe Conference - Volume 2, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland, 19-21 September 2018, pp. 795-804 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2018.2.795
|
summary |
In the design studio, Virtual Reality (VR) has mainly been included as a visualization tool to explore pre-designed ideas developed in traditional 3D software or using pen on paper. Meanwhile, a reshaping of the design process has been taking place, bringing forward interaction/experiential concerns and co-design approaches throughout disciplines in a push for a more thorough consideration of projects' contexts. This paper reports an exploratory study of how immersive contextual representations influence the co-ideation process. Audio-video recordings of co-ideation sessions (9) from a pedagogical studio were analyzed through verbal and representational (sketches and design gestures) exchanges as occurring in three different conditions: (a) pen on paper, immersive headset-free VR (b) without, and (c) with the use of contextual immersive environment (photogrammetric scans and 3D models). Results show that, although design conversations were similar across all conditions, design gestures were more often directly related to- than independent from the graphical representation only when using an immersive contextual environment. Furthermore, the rate of sketching episodes in general and sketching explanations were considerably lower in this condition. This could imply that use of pre-made context greatly reduces the need of sketching elements to support a clearer co-ideation. |
keywords |
Immersive context; Design gestures; Design conversations; Sketches; Co-design studio; Design cognition |
series |
eCAADe |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (5,411,471 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Alibali, MW (2005)
Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information
, Spatial cognition and computation, 5(4), pp. 307-331
|
|
|
|
Ball, LJ, Lambell, NJ, Reed, SE and Reid, FJ (2001)
The exploration of solution options in design: A 'Naturalistic Decision Making' perspective
, Proceedings of the Fifth Design Thinking Research Symposium, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 79-93
|
|
|
|
Coelho, C (2015)
The Living Experience as a design content: from concept to appropriation
, Ambiances. Experimental simulations, 1, pp. 1-19
|
|
|
|
Dorta, T, Kalay, Y, Lesage, A and Pérez, E (2011)
Elements of design conversation in the interconnected HIS
, International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 18(2), pp. 65-80
|
|
|
|
Dorta, T, Kinayoglu, G and Hoffmann, M (2016)
Hyve-3D and the 3D Cursor: Architectural co-design with freedom in Virtual Reality
, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(2), pp. 87-102
|
|
|
|
Glenberg, AM, Witt, JK and Metcalfe, J (2013)
From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology
, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), pp. 573-585
|
|
|
|
Hauk, O, Johnsrude, I and Pulvermuller, F (2004)
Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex
, Neuron, 41, pp. 301-307
|
|
|
|
Hawton, D (2018)
Shared immersive environments for parametric model manipulation: Evaluating a workflow for parametric model manipulation from within immersive virtual environments
, Fukuda, T, Huang, W, Janssen, P, Crolla, K and Alhadidi, S (eds), Learning, Adapting and Prototyping Proceedings of the 23rd CAADRIA Volume 1, CAADRIA, Hong Kong, pp. 483-492
|
|
|
|
Hostetter, AB and Alibali, MW (2008)
Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action
, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 15(3), pp. 495-514
|
|
|
|
Hostetter, AB and Boncoddo, R (2017)
Gestures highlight perceptual-motor representations in thinking
, Church, RB, Alibali, MW and Kelly, SD (eds), Why gesture, John Benjamins, pp. 155-174
|
|
|
|
Härkki, T, Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P and Hakkarainen, K (2018)
Hands on design: comparing the use of sketching and gesturing in collaborative designing
, Journal of Design Research, 16, pp. 24-46
|
|
|
|
Jelić, A (2015)
Designing "pre-reflective" architecture. Implications of neurophenomenology for architectural design and thinking
, Ambiances. Experimental simulations, 1, pp. 1-14
|
|
|
|
Jonson, B (2005)
Design Ideation: The conceptual sketch in the digital age
, Design Studies, 26(6), pp. 613-624
|
|
|
|
Klein, G (2008)
Naturalistic decision making
, Human factors, 50(3), pp. 456-460
|
|
|
|
Larson, AM and Loschky, LC (2009)
The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. , 9(10), 6-6.
, Journal of Vision, 9(10), pp. 1-16
|
|
|
|
Lehtovuori, P (2016)
Experience and conflict: The production of urban space
, Routledge, New York
|
|
|
|
McNeill, D (2005)
Gesture and thought
, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, US
|
|
|
|
Messner, JI (2006)
Evaluating the use of immersive display media for construction planning
, Smith, IFC (eds), Intelligent computing in engineering and architecture, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 484-491
|
|
|
|
Pallasmaa, J (2014)
Space, place and atmosphere. Emotion and peripherical perception in architectural experience
, Lebenswelt. Aesthetics and philosophy of experience, 4, pp. 230-245
|
|
|
|
Rizzolatti, G, Fadiga, L, Gallese, V and Fogassi, L (1996)
Pre- motor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
, Cognitive Brain Research, 3, pp. 131-141
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:54 |
|