| id |
ecaade2022_171 |
| authors |
Daher, Elie, Kubicki, Sylvain and Pak, Burak |
| year |
2022 |
| title |
Propositions for Enabling Participation in Performance-Driven Design |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2022.1.421
|
| source |
Pak, B, Wurzer, G and Stouffs, R (eds.), Co-creating the Future: Inclusion in and through Design - Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2022) - Volume 1, Ghent, 13-16 September 2022, pp. 421–430 |
| summary |
In Performance-Driven Design, it is challenging for different stakeholders such as the end-users to participate in the co-designing process. Performance-driven design requires complex algorithmic calculations, simulations, and optimizations. These computational functionalities enabled for this design process lack of transparency and can be sometimes complicated to understand. Therefore, the current applications of Performance-Driven Design contradict the participatory design where social interactions are considered as important steps to produce desirable and accepted design outcomes. In this context, the main aim of this study reported in this paper based on a 4-years PhD thesis at Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology and KU Leuven, is to address research methods suitable for enabling higher levels of participation in Performance-Driven Design and thus to provide recommendations and guidelines. |
| keywords |
Performance-Driven Design, Participation Design Process, Architectural Design, Performance and Requirements Modeling |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (1,133,541 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Abdelalim, A. and O'brien, W. (2017)
 Visualization of building performance using sankey diagrams to enhance the decision-making process
, Simulation Series, 49(11), pp. 118-125. doi: 10.22360/simaud.2017.simaud.016
|
|
|
|
|
Agarwal, B. (2001)
Participatory Exclusions
, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework. Available at: www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev
|
|
|
|
|
Al-Kodmany, K. (1999)
Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: Process, implementation, and evaluation
, Landscape and Urban Planning, 45(1), pp. 37-45. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-9
|
|
|
|
|
Arnstein, S. R. (1969)
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), pp. 216-224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
|
|
|
|
|
Attia, S. et al. (2013)
Assessing gaps and needs for integrating building performance optimization tools in net zero energy buildings design
, Energy and Buildings. Elsevier B.V., 60, pp. 110-124. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.016
|
|
|
|
|
Camporeale, P. (2013)
Genetic Algorithms Applied to Urban Growth Optimization: Solar envelope and solar fan
, Computation and Performance: Proceedings of the 31st conference on education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2013), 2(Figure 1), pp. 227-236
|
|
|
|
|
Chronis, A., Liapi, K. A. and Sibetheros, I. (2012)
A parametric approach to the bioclimatic design of large scale projects: The case of a student housing complex
, Automation in Construction. Elsevier B.V., 22, pp. 24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.007
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaver, F. (1999)
Paradoxes of participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development
, Journal of International Development, 11(4), pp. 597-612. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<597::AID-JID610>3.0.CO;2-Q
|
|
|
|
|
Daher, E. and Kubicki, S. (2020)
A Participative Framework Covering Urban Planning Process with A Parametric Approach
, ICCCBE 2020: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on ComputingCivil and Building Engineering. ICCCBE 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_87
|
|
|
|
|
Frazer, J. et al. (2002)
Generative and Evolutionary Techniques for Building Envelope Design
, 5th International Generative Art Conference GA2002, 2002(December), pp. 1-16
|
|
|
|
|
Gallo, G. and Pellitteri, G. (2018)
Luigi Moretti, From history to parametric architecture
, Proceedings of the 23rd Internafional Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design ResearchAsia CAADRIA, pp. 209-214
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly, D. (2001)
Community participation in rangeland management
, AgriFutures Australia, Available online: https://www.agrifutures.com.au/wp-content/uploads/publications/01-118.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
Lyons, M., Smuts, C. and Stephens, A. (2001)
Participation, Empowerment and Sustainability: (How) Do the Links Work?
, Urban Studies, 38(8), pp. 1233-1251. doi: 10.1080/00420980120061007
|
|
|
|
|
Miessen, M. (2017)
Crossbenching: Towards a proactive mode of participation as a Critical Spatial Practice
, Doutorado. Available at: http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/20980
|
|
|
|
|
Monedero, J. (2000)
Parametric design: a review and some experiences
, Automation in Construction 9 (4), pp. 369-377
|
|
|
|
|
Mubita, A., Libati, M. and Mulonda, M. (2017)
The Importance and Limitations of Participation in Development Projects and Programmes
, European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(5), p. 238. doi: 10.19044/esj.2017.v13n5p238
|
|
|
|
|
Oxman, R. (2017)
Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking
, Design Studies, 52(June), pp. 4-39. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001
|
|
|
|
|
Park, C. S. et al. (2013)
A framework for proactive construction defect management using BIM, augmented reality and ontology-based data collection template
, Automation in Construction, 33(August 2016), pp. 61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.010
|
|
|
|
|
Preiser, W. F. E. and Schramm, U. (2002)
Intelligent office building performance evaluation
, Facilities, 20, pp. 279-287. doi: 10.1108/02632770210435198
|
|
|
|
|
Price, S. and Mylius, B. (1991)
Social analysis and community participation: guidelines and activity cycle checklist
, Australian International Development Assistance Bureau. Appraisals, Evaluation and Sectoral Studies Branch
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2024/04/22 07:10 |
|
