id |
ecaade2022_196 |
authors |
Li, Jiaqi, Lo, Tian Tian, Guo, Xiangmin and Chen, Fukai |
year |
2022 |
title |
Integrating XR and Tangible Model to Enhance Old Building Renovation Design |
source |
Pak, B, Wurzer, G and Stouffs, R (eds.), Co-creating the Future: Inclusion in and through Design - Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2022) - Volume 2, Ghent, 13-16 September 2022, pp. 207–216 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2022.2.207
|
summary |
The renovation of old buildings usually has complex site constraints, involves multiple interests, and has limited capital costs. Therefore, the transformation process has always encouraged the participation of stakeholders to improve the effectiveness of the design. Tangible user interfaces (TUIs) consisting of physical models further simplify the operation. However, most designs are displayed by projection, which cannot provide a realistic interactive experience. Extended Reality (XR) technology has the advantages of interactivity and clear visualization. We developed a participatory renovation tool using XR technology and tangible models. We invited the owner to view the 3D design proposal in HoloLens and then use the tangible model to discuss the renovation design. This experiment proves that the system can realize on-site 3D visualization, allowing the public to design in a real environment and intuitively interact with the virtual and the real. Using the participatory design method of XR technology + tangible model will provide a convenient platform for the renovation of old buildings with the collaborative participation of stakeholders. |
keywords |
Building Renovation Design, Participatory Design, Extended Reality, Tangible Model, HoloLens |
series |
eCAADe |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (2,272,397 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Dalsgaard, P. & Halskov, K. (2012)
Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection
, Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, pp. 109-118
|
|
|
|
Eslam, Nofal, Robin, Stevens, Thomas, & Coomans, et al. (2018)
Communicating the spatiotemporal transformation of architectural heritage via an in-situ projection mapping installation
, Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 11, e00083
|
|
|
|
Gao, S. (2020)
existing building renovation; BIM + VR technology; design scheme optimization
, Master thesis, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun
|
|
|
|
He, C. Ho, Y. Ding, L. & Li, P. (2021)
Visualized literature review on sustainable building renovation
, Journal of Building Engineering, 44(3-4), 102622
|
|
|
|
Ishii, H. Ratti, C. Piper, B. Wang, Y. Biderman, A.and Ben-Joseph, E. (2004)
Bringing clay and sand into digital design-continuous tangible user interfaces
, BT technology journal 22, 4 , pp.287-299
|
|
|
|
Kwiecinski, K. Markusiewicz, J. & Pasternak, A. (2017)
Participatory Design Supported with Design System and Augmented Reality
, 35th eCAADe Conference
|
|
|
|
LO, T. T. Schnabel, MA. (2020)
Towards Participatory Design and Its Prospective Applications
, Architectural Journal, No.624(10):114-121
|
|
|
|
Noyman, A. & Larson, K. (2020)
A deep image of the city: generative urban-design visualization
, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, pp. 1-8
|
|
|
|
Patten, J. Ishii, H. Hines, J. and Pangaro, G. (2001)
Sensetable: a wireless object tracking platform for tangible user interfaces
, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factorscomputing systems, ACM, pp.253-260
|
|
|
|
Penn, A. Mottram, C. Schieck, A. Wittkämper, M. Störring, M. & Romell, O. et al. (2004)
Augmented reality meeting table: a novel multi-user interface for architectural design
, Springer Netherlands
|
|
|
|
Schubert, G. Riedel, S. Petzold, F. (2013)
Seamfully connected: real working models as tangible interfaces for architectural design
, Zhang, J., Sun, C. (eds.) CAAD Futures. CCIS,vol. 369, pp. 210-221. Springer, Heidelberg.Thailand, pp.18-20. Master of Science ProgramComputer-Aided Architectural Design,Faculty of Architecture, Rangsit University, Thailand, pp. 209-222
|
|
|
|
Schubert, G. Schattel, D. Tönnis, M. Klinker, G. & Petzold, F. (2015)
Tangible mixed reality on-site: interactive augmented visualisations from architectural working models in urban design
, Springer Berlin Heidelberg
|
|
|
|
Seichter, H. (2003)
Sketchand+ a collaborative augmented reality sketching application
, Choutgrajank, A. (ed.) CAADRIA 2003. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference onComputer-Aided Architectural Design ResearchAsia. CAADRIA, Bangkok
|
|
|
|
Underkoffler, J. and Ishii, H. (1999)
Urp: A LuminousTangible Workbench for Urban
, proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1, pp. 386-393
|
|
|
|
Välkkynen, P. Siltanen, S. Väätänen, A. Oksman, V. Honkamaa, P. Ylikauppila,M. (2013)
Developing mixed reality tools to support citizen participation in urban planning
, ExS 2.0:Exploring Urban Spacesthe Web 2.0 Era, Munich, Germany
|
|
|
|
Yda, B. Zsa, B. Jx, C. Yz, D. Ling, H. E. & Jz, F. (2021)
Holodesigner: a mixed reality tool for on-site design
, Automation in Construction, 129
|
|
|
|
Zhu, Y. Fukuda, T. and Yabuki, N. (2019)
Integrating animated computational fluid dynamics into mixed reality for building-renovation design
, Technologies, 8(1), 4
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2024/04/22 07:10 |
|