| id |
ecaade2022_85 |
| authors |
Ataman, Cem, Herthogs, Pieter, Tuncer, Bige and Perrault, Simon |
| year |
2022 |
| title |
Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Digital Participation - A framework to evaluate participation in urban design processes |
| source |
Pak, B, Wurzer, G and Stouffs, R (eds.), Co-creating the Future: Inclusion in and through Design - Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2022) - Volume 1, Ghent, 13-16 September 2022, pp. 401–410 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2022.1.401
|
| summary |
Data-driven urban design processes consist of iterative actions of many stakeholders, which require digital participatory approaches for collecting data from a high number of participants to make informed decisions. It is important to evaluate such processes to justify the necessary costs and efforts while continuously improving digital participation. Nevertheless, such evaluation remains a challenge due to the involvement of different stakeholders including participants, designers, and policymakers in decision-making processes, and the lack of a systematic method to generalize participation outputs that are mostly situated and context based. By addressing this challenge, this paper introduces a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) based framework to measure the effectiveness and quality of digital participation systematically and quantitatively. To achieve such evaluation, we conducted a digital participation experiment and investigated such processes with the help of participants, designers, and policymakers from Singapore and Hamburg. By formulating this framework, we aim to reveal perspectives of different stakeholders towards digital participation and enable the evaluation and comparison of digital participation processes based on the introduced digital participation criteria. |
| keywords |
Data-Driven Urban Design, Digital Participation, Stakeholder Involvement, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), Participation Quantification |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (276,877 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Ali, H. and Ali, T. (2015)
 E-participation: Factors affect Citizens acceptance and readiness in Kingdom of Bahrain
, International Conference on Information Society, i-Society 2014, pp. 146-150. d
|
|
|
|
|
Ataman, C. and Tuncer, B. (2022)
Urban Interventions and Participation Tools in Urban Design Processes: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis (1995 - 2021)
, Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, p. 103462
|
|
|
|
|
Banjac, M. (2017)
E-participation as a technology of citizenship
, Teorija in Praksa, 54(1), pp. 73-91
|
|
|
|
|
Baran-Kooiker, A., Czech, M. and Kooiker, C. (2018)
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Models in Health Technology Assessment of Orphan Drugs-a Systematic Literature Review. Next Steps in Methodology Development?
, Frontiers in Public Health, 6
|
|
|
|
|
Belton, V. and Stewart, J. T. (2002)
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach
, Boston, MA: Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V
|
|
|
|
|
Brünken, R., Seufert, T. and Paas, F. (2010)
Measuring Cognitive Load
, Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., and Brunken, R. (eds) Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181-202
|
|
|
|
|
Cinelli, M., Coles, S. R. and Kirwan, K. (2014)
Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment
, Ecological Indicators, 46, pp. 138-148
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis, B. K. (2014)
Understanding Participant Experiences: Reflections of a Novice Research Participant
, Int. J. Qualitative Methods, 13(1), pp. 395-410
|
|
|
|
|
El-Kholei, A. O. and Yassein, G. (2022)
Professionals perceptions for designing vibrant public spaces: Theory and praxis
, Ain Shams Engineering J., 13(5), p. 101727
|
|
|
|
|
Estévez, R. A. et al. (2021)
Multi-criteria decision analysis for renewable energies: Research trends, gaps and the challenge of improving participation
, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6)
|
|
|
|
|
Grant, A. and Curtis, A. (2004)
Refining Evaluation Criteria for Public Participation Using Stakeholder Perspectives of Process and Outcomes
, Rural Society, 14(2), pp. 142-162
|
|
|
|
|
He, P. et al. (2020)
A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Based Framework to Evaluate Public Space Quality
, Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 271-283
|
|
|
|
|
Hofmann, M., Münster, S. and Noennig, J. R. (2020)
A Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of Massive Digital Participation Systems in Urban Planning
, J. Geo-visualization and Spatial Analysis, 4(1), p. 3
|
|
|
|
|
Langemeyer, J. et al. (2016)
Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
, Environmental Science and Policy, 62, pp. 45-56
|
|
|
|
|
Laurian, L. and Shaw, M. M. (2009)
Evaluation of Public Participation
, J. Planning Education and Research, 28(3), pp. 293-309
|
|
|
|
|
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2015)
The influence of political factors in policymakers perceptions on the implementation of Web 2.0 technologies for citizen participation and knowledge sharing in public sector delivery
, Information Polity. Edited by J. Zhang, G. Puron-Cid, and J. R. Gil-Garcia, 20(2,3), pp. 199-220
|
|
|
|
|
Shekhovtsov, V. A., Mayr, H. C. and Kop, C. (2014)
Harmonizing the Quality View of Stakeholders
, Relating System Quality and Software Architecture. Boston, MA: Elsevier, pp. 41-73
|
|
|
|
|
Tekler, Z. D., Low, R. and Blessing, L. (2022)
User perceptions on the adoption of smart energy management systems in the workplace: Design and policy implications
, Energy Research & Social Science, 88, p. 102505
|
|
|
|
|
Zhang, Y. J., Li, A. J. and Fung, T. (2012)
Using GIS and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Conflict Resolution in Land Use Planning
, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13(2011), pp. 2264-2273
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2024/04/22 07:10 |
|
