id |
ecaade2024_225 |
authors |
Govindarajan, Praveen; Ortner, F. Peter; Aydin, Elif Esra |
year |
2024 |
title |
What Density for Net Zero Energy?: A trade-off between energy use, renewables, and indoor thermal comfort for high-rise residential precincts in tropical climates |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2024.2.037
|
source |
Kontovourkis, O, Phocas, MC and Wurzer, G (eds.), Data-Driven Intelligence - Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2024), Nicosia, 11-13 September 2024, Volume 2, pp. 37–46 |
summary |
With advancements in Architectural Design Optimization (ADO) and Building Performance Simulation (BSP) tools, achieving Net Zero Energy (NZE) buildings is feasible by optimizing the balance between energy demand and on-site renewable energy generation. However, this poses several challenges in land-scarce urban areas, where on-site NZE is achievable with the tradeoff between development density (i.e., gross plot ratio - GPR), regions on-site for photovoltaic deployment, and energy efficiency associated with indoor thermal comfort (ITC). This study introduces a method to optimize high-rise residential precincts for NZE and ITC goals in tropical cities: Chennai and Singapore. The research evaluates design parameters related to urban layout, building geometry, and building performance through simulation-based optimization workflow. Though using a scalarized single-objective optimization (SOO) approach, this study identifies optimal densities of greater than 3.6 GPR for Chennai and 3 GPR for Singapore, meeting near-zero goals while ensuring adequate comfort. In conclusion, this applied methodology provides insights into the trade-offs between site density, indoor comfort, and net zero goals for tropical NZE urban developments. |
keywords |
Design for Net Zero, Multi-Objective Optimization, Building Energy Performance, photovoltaics, Indoor Thermal Comfort |
series |
eCAADe |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (1,033,255 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Attia, S. and Carlucci, S. (2015)
Impact of different thermal comfort models on zero energy residential buildings in hot climate
, Energy and Buildings, 102, pp. 117-128
|
|
|
|
Gamero-Salinas, J. et al. (2021)
Passive cooling design strategies as adaptation measures for lowering the indoor overheating risk in tropical climates
, Energy and Buildings, 252, p. 111417
|
|
|
|
Lan, L., Wood, K.L. and Yuen, C. (2019)
A holistic design approach for residential net-zero energy buildings: A case study in Singapore
, Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, p. 101672
|
|
|
|
Li, J. et al. (2022)
Effects of residential building height, density, and floor area ratios on indoor thermal environment in Singapore
, Journal of Environmental Management, 313, p. 114976
|
|
|
|
Natanian, J. (2023)
Optimizing mixed-use district designs in hot climates: A two-phase computational workflow for energy balance and environmental performance
, Sustainable Cities and Society, 98, p. 104800
|
|
|
|
Ponnurangam, P. and Umadevi, G. (2016)
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for Chennai IT Corridor
, Transportation Research Procedia, 17, pp. 234-243
|
|
|
|
Solemma. (2020)
ClimateStudio
, Solemma LLC. https://www.solemma.com/ClimateStudio.html
|
|
|
|
Taylor, M., Brown, N.C. and Rim, D. (2021)
Optimizing thermal comfort and energy use for learning environments
, Energy and Buildings, 248, p. 111181
|
|
|
|
URA (2019)
Flats and condominiums
, Urban Redevelopment Authority. Available at: https://www.ura.gov.sg (Accessed: 11 Nov 2023)
|
|
|
|
Wortmann, T. (2017)
Opossum - Introducing and Evaluating a Model-based Optimization Tool for Grasshopper
, CAADRIA 2017: Protocols, Flows, and Glitches, Suzhou, China, pp. 283-292
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2024/11/17 22:05 |
|