| id |
ecaade2024_399 |
| authors |
Khan, Md Zishaan; Erhan, Halil; Yagmur Kilimci, Elif Sezen |
| year |
2024 |
| title |
Data-Informed Design Democratization: Engaging design stakeholders for creating livable built environments |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2024.2.475
|
| source |
Kontovourkis, O, Phocas, MC and Wurzer, G (eds.), Data-Driven Intelligence - Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2024), Nicosia, 11-13 September 2024, Volume 2, pp. 475–484 |
| summary |
Fostering an inclusive and democratic decision-making process is essential to developing liveable, socially acceptable, and environmentally conscious built environments. For informed decision-making in this process, stakeholders’ understanding of design data plays an important role, as do the other disciplines embracing data-informed discourses and cultures. However, more work is needed to develop novel platforms for supporting data-informed decision-making in built environment design. Public engagement and town hall meetings are common methods to engage the public. They are often restricted by time, space, and participation scope. The online tools for data democratization in various fields offer opportunities to promote a democratic discourse; although their purpose varies, their characteristics can guide the search for novel approaches adopting a new class of tools for building design. We propose a conceptual framework for evaluating and designing tools supporting data-informed [built environment] design democratization through inclusive discourses called Di-Dem. As a contribution, we demonstrated the application of the framework in evaluating ten platforms offered for similar purposes. |
| keywords |
Data Democratization, Democratic Discourse in Built Environment Design, Data-informed Participation, Inclusive Data Visualization, Engaging Stakeholders |
| series |
eCAADe |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (828,909 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Alsalman, O. & Erhan, H. (2023)
 D-ART for collaboration in evaluating design alternatives
, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 20(1), pp. 114-128
|
|
|
|
|
Awasthi, P. & George, J. J. (2020)
A case for data democratization
, Proc. Of AMCIS 2020
|
|
|
|
|
Cascetta, E. & Pagliara, F. (2013)
Public engagement for planning and designing transportation systems
, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 87, pp. 103-116
|
|
|
|
|
Enwereji, P.C. & Uwizeyimana, D.E. (2020)
Enhancing democracy through public participation process during Covid-19 pandemic: A review
, Gender & Behaviour, 18(4), pp. 16873-16888
|
|
|
|
|
Escobar, A. (2011)
Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World (Vol. 1)
, Princeton University Press
|
|
|
|
|
Gajendra, S., Xi, B. & Wang, Q. (2012)
E-government: Public participation and ethical issues
, J. of e-Governance, 35(4), pp. 195-204
|
|
|
|
|
Hyun, Y., Kamioka, T., & Hosoya, R. (2020)
Improving agility using big data analytics: The role of democratization culture
, Pacific Asia J. of the Assoc. for Inf. Sys., 12(2), p. 2
|
|
|
|
|
Jutraz, A. & Zupancic, T. (2015)
Virtual worlds as support tools for public engagement in urban design
, Planning support systems and smart cities, pp. 391-408
|
|
|
|
|
Katika, T., Karaseitanidis, I., Tsiakou, D., Makropoulos, C. & Amditis, A. (2022)
Augmented reality (AR) supporting citizen engagement in circular economy
, Circular economy and sust., 2(3), pp. 1077-1104
|
|
|
|
|
Khan, M. Z., Erhan, H., & Abuzuraiq, A. M. (2024)
A critical review of data democratisation and its adoption in designing built-environments
, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA)
|
|
|
|
|
Labadie, C., Legner, C., Eurich, M. & Fadler, M. (2020)
Fair enough? enhancing the usage of enterprise data with data catalogs
, 2020 IEEE 22nd Business Inf. (Vol. 1, pp. 201-210)
|
|
|
|
|
Lane, J. (2021)
Democratizing our data: A manifesto
, MIT Press
|
|
|
|
|
Lefebvre, H., Legner, C. & Fadler, M. (2021)
Data Democratisation: Toward a deeper understanding
, Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Information Systems
|
|
|
|
|
Lukensmeyer, C.J. & Brigham, S. (2002)
Taking democracy to scale: Creating a town hall meeting for the twenty-first century
, Nat'l Civic Rev., 91, p. 351
|
|
|
|
|
Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S. & Meijer, A. (2017)
Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use
, Gov. Inf. Quarterly, 34(1), pp. 45-52
|
|
|
|
|
Skelcher, C. & Torfing, J. (2010)
Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe
, Regulation & Governance, 4(1), pp. 71-91
|
|
|
|
|
van Mill, D. (1996)
The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedures
, The J. of Politics, 58(3)
|
|
|
|
|
Wang, X., et.al. (2021)
Evaluation of mobile-based public participation in Chinas urban planning: A case study of the PinStreet
, Cities, 109
|
|
|
|
|
Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M. & Comber, R. (2019)
Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes
, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), pp. 286-302
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2024/11/17 22:05 |
|
