id |
ecaadesigradi2019_142 |
authors |
Gün, Ahmet, Demir, Yüksel and Pak, Burak |
year |
2019 |
title |
Understanding Design Empowerment through ICT-based Platforms in European Cities |
source |
Sousa, JP, Xavier, JP and Castro Henriques, G (eds.), Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution - Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference - Volume 2, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 11-13 September 2019, pp. 819-827 |
doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2019.2.819
|
summary |
The use of ICT-based participation tools in urban design has gained importance in the last decade. In order to enable the citizens and other stakeholders to participate in city-making processes, a wide range of ICT-enabled participatory tools, techniques, and applications have been developed.. Many studies have reported that the use of these participatory platforms has led to positive outcomes but the platforms' potentials and limits for facilitating different levels of design empowerment still remain unknown. In this context, this study aims to determine how these platforms empower citizens' engagement and identify the key factors that can facilitate better participation practices. This research analyses 25 ICT-based participation platforms by focusing on 4 key criteria:(1) their objectives, (2) the design action phases in which they are designated to be used, (3) their desired levels of design empowerment, and (4) offered functions. Our study reveals that more than three-fourth of analysed platforms still complemented by off-line participation activities. Empowering citizens to design independently is still a challenging task so just three platforms (12%) allow users to create their own plans and visions. Finally, we identify several influence factors for better ICT-based participatory design practices. |
keywords |
citizen empowerment; participatory design; ICT-based participation; urban design |
series |
eCAADeSIGraDi |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (870,398 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Boyko, C. T., Cooper, R. and Davey, C. (2005)
Sustainability and the urban design process
, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, p. 119-125
|
|
|
|
Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S. and Crosby, B. C. (2013)
Designing public participation processes
, Public Administration Review, 73(1), p. 23-34
|
|
|
|
Carmona, M. (2014)
The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process
, Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), p. 2-36
|
|
|
|
Connor, D. M. (1988)
A new ladder of citizen participation
, National Civic Review, 77(3), p. 249-257
|
|
|
|
de Reuver, M., Stein, S. and Hampe, J. F. (2013)
From eParticipation to mobile participation: Designing a service platform and business model for mobile participation
, Information Polity, 18(1), p. 57-73
|
|
|
|
Desouza, K. C. and Bhagwatwar, A. (2014)
Technology-enabled participatory platforms for civic engagement: The case of US cities
, Journal of Urban Technology, 21(4), p. 25-50
|
|
|
|
Ertiö, T. P. (2015)
Participatory apps for urban planning-space for improvement
, Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), p. 303-321
|
|
|
|
Evans-Cowley, J. S. and Kubinski, B. (2015)
There's an App for that: Mobile applications that advance urban planning
, Silva, C. N. (eds), Emerging issues, challenges, and opportunities in urban E-planning, IGI Global, p. 33-45
|
|
|
|
Falco, E. and Kleinhans, R. (2018)
Digital participatory platforms for co-production in urban development: A systematic review
, International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7(3), p. 1-21
|
|
|
|
Gün, A., Demir, Y. and Pak, B. (2019)
Urban design empowerment through ICT-based platforms in Europe
, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 29, pp. 1-27
|
|
|
|
Höffken, S. and Streich, B. (2013)
Mobile participation: Citizen engagement in urban planning via smartphones
, Silva, C. N. (eds), Citizen e-participation in urban governance: Crowdsourcing and collaborative creativity, IGI Global., p. 199-225
|
|
|
|
Kleinhans, R., Van Ham, M. and Evans-Cowley, J. (2015)
Using social media and mobile Technologies to foster engagement and self-organisation in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance
, Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), p. 237-247
|
|
|
|
Münster, S., Georgi, C., Heijne, K., Klamert, K., Noennig, J. R., Pump, M. and van der Meer, H. (2017)
How to involve inhabitants in urban design planning by using digital tools? An overview on a state of the art, key challenges and promising approaches
, Procedia Computer Science, 112, p. 2391-2405
|
|
|
|
Pak, B. and Verbeke, J. (2014)
Geoweb 2.0 for participatory urban design: Affordances and critical success factors
, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 12(3), p. 283-305
|
|
|
|
Pak, B. and Verbeke, J. (2014)
Geoweb 2.0 and design empowerment: A critical evaluation of eleven cases
, Digital Humanities 2014 Conference Proceedings
|
|
|
|
Pak, B., Chua, A. and Vande Moere, A. (2017)
Fixmystreet Brussels: Socio-demographic inequality in crowdsourced civic participation
, Journal of Urban Technology, 24(2), p. 65-87
|
|
|
|
Poorazizi, M. E., Steiniger, S. and Hunter, A. J. (2015)
A service-oriented architecture to enable participatory planning: An e-planning platform
, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(7), p. 1081-1110
|
|
|
|
Rocha, E. M. (1997)
A ladder of empowerment
, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1), p. 31-44
|
|
|
|
Sanders, E. B.-N., Brandt, E. and Binder, T. (2010)
A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design
, Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference., pp. 195-198.
|
|
|
|
Schröder, C. (2014)
Mobile participation in urban development. International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI)
, Proceedings of the COOP 2014 Workshop on Collaborative Technologies in Democratic Processes, p. 37-44.
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/06/07 07:50 |
|