| id |
ecaadesigradi2019_389 |
| authors |
Mohite, Ashish, Kochneva, Mariia and Kotnik, Toni |
| year |
2019 |
| title |
Speed of Deposition - Vehicle for structural and aesthetic expression in CAM |
| source |
Sousa, JP, Xavier, JP and Castro Henriques, G (eds.), Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution - Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference - Volume 1, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 11-13 September 2019, pp. 729-738 |
| doi |
https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2019.1.729
|
| summary |
This paper presents intermediate results of an experimental research directed towards development of a method that uses additive manufacturing technology as a generative agent in architectural design process. The primary technique is to variate speed of material deposition of a 3D printer in order to produce undetermined textural effects. These effects demonstrate local variation of material distribution, which is treated as a consequence of interaction between machining parameters and material properties. Current stage of inquiry is concerned with studying the impact of these textural artefacts on structure. Experiments demonstrate that manipulating distribution of matter locally results in more optimal structural performance, it solves printability issues of overhanging geometry without the need for additional supports and provides variation to the surface. The research suggests aesthetic and structural benefits of applying the developed method for mass-customized fabrication. It questions the linear thinking that is predominant in the field of 3D printing and provides an approach that articulates interaction between digital and material logics as it directs the formation of an object that is informed by both. |
| keywords |
digital fabrication; digital craft; texture; ceramic 3D printing |
| series |
eCAADeSIGraDi |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (47,930,425 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Atwood, A (2012)
 Monolithic representations
, Bordon, G and Meredith, M (eds), Matter: material processes in architectural production, Routledge
|
|
|
|
|
Cache, B (2004)
Towards an associative architecture
, Leach, N, Turnbull, D and Williams, CJK (eds), Digital tectonics, Wiley, pp. 103-109
|
|
|
|
|
Cohen, Z (2018)
Hold Up: Machine Delay in Architectural Design
, Willmann, J, Block, P, Hutter, M, Byrne, K and Schork, T (eds), Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2018, Springer, pp. 126-138
|
|
|
|
|
Fleischmann, M, Knippers, J, Lienhard, J, Menges, A and Schleicher, S (2012)
Material Behaviour: Embedding Physical Properties in Computational Design Processes
, Architectural Design, 82, pp. 44-51
|
|
|
|
|
Gramazio, F and Kohler, M (2008)
Digital materiality in architecture
, Lars Müller Publishers, Baden
|
|
|
|
|
Kolarevic, B (2008)
The (Risky) craft of digital making
, Kolarevic, B and Klinger, K (eds), Manufacturing material effects: rethinking design and making in architecture, Routledge, pp. 119-128
|
|
|
|
|
Mohite, A, Kotnik, T and Kochneva, M (2018)
Material Agency in CAM of Undesignable Textural Effects
, Proceedings of eCAADe 2018, Lodz, pp. 293-300
|
|
|
|
|
Pye, D (1968)
The nature and art of workmanship
, Studio Vista, Cambridge
|
|
|
|
|
Pérez, SR (2017)
Loss of control: error, glitch, and imperfection in architecture
, Borden, GP and Meredith, M (eds), Lineament Material, Representation, and the Physical Figure in Architectural Production, Routledge, New York, pp. 156-174
|
|
|
|
|
Satterfield, B and Swackhamer, M (2017)
Why architects should want to give up control and predictability
, Borden, GP and Meredith, M (eds), Lineament Material, Representation, and the Physical Figure in Architectural Production, Routledge, New York, pp. 52- 60
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2022/06/07 07:58 |
|
